The Assessment of Coner bute Value of Breast Disease with Ultrasound Elastography Imaging for the BI-RADS-US Categories

陈晓姣,陈曼,李丽蟾,牛建梅,贾宛儒
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2016.07.004
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of different methods with ultrasound elastography (UE) imaging technology combined with routine ultrasound breast lesions BI-RADS-US reassessment.Methods 277 patients with 316 lesions which conformed by pathology were included in the study.The lesions were classified with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories by ultrasound (BI-RADS-US).And then reclassified by different evaluations of ultrasound elastography,which were the Itoh's 5 scores method (Itoh),the strain ratio method (SR),the histogram mean method (HM),at a hard level of 20% the proportion of the area of interest (HL20%) and the classification of BI-RADS-US (2nd edition)(the trichotomy method).Results The sensitivity,specificity,the area under the curve (AUC) were 78.92%,88.67%,0.887 by applying conventional ultrasound to BI-RADS categories of breast lesions only.After the application of different ultrasound elastography assessment methods to conventional ultrasound BI-RADS categories adjust the sensitivity of the five methods were 85.54%,86.14%,78.92%,78.92%,84.34% and specificity were 86.00%,86.00%,86.00%,86.67%,86.67%,the AUC were 0.904,0.911,0.882,0.880,0.902.Conclusions The Itoh's 5 scores method,the SR method,the trichotomy method can improve the diagnostic sensitivity of malignant breast lesions after reclassify the BI-BRDS categories,and the strain ratio method is most obvious and play an important role in the clinical application.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?