Abstract:PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the independent risk factors and associated predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), shear wave elastography (SWE), and strain elastography (SE) for high-risk lesions (HRL) and malignant tumors (MT) among nonpalpable breast masses classified as BI-RADS category 4 on conventional ultrasound.METHODS: This prospective study involved consecutively admitted patients with breast tumors from January 2018, aiming to explore the management of BI-RADS category 4 breast tumors using CEUS and elastography. We conducted a retrospective review of patient data, focusing on those with a history of a nonpalpable mass as the primary complaint. Pathologic findings after surgical resection served as the gold standard. The CEUS arterial-phase indices were analyzed using contrast agent arrival-time parametric imaging processing mode, while quantitative and qualitative indices were examined on ES images. Independent risk factors were identified through binary logistic regression multifactorial analysis. The predictive efficacy of different modalities was compared using a receiver operating characteristics curve. Subsequently, a nomogram for predicting the risk of HRL/MT was established based on a multifactorial logistic regression model.RESULTS: A total of 146 breast masses from 146 patients were included, comprising 80 benign tumors, 12 HRLs, and 54 MTs based on the final pathology. There was no significant difference in pathologic size between the benign and HRL/MT groups [8.00(6.25,10.00) vs. 9.00(6.00,10.00), P = 0.506]. The diagnostic efficacy of US plus CEUS exceeded that of US plus SWE/SE for BI-RADS 4 nonpalpable masses, with an AUC of 0.954 compared to 0.798/0.741 (P < 0.001). Further stratified analysis revealed a more pronounced improvement for reclassification of BI-RADS 4a masses (AUC: 0.943 vs. 0.762/0.675, P < 0.001) than BI-RADS 4b (AUC:0.950 vs. 0.885/0.796, P>0.05) with the assistance of CEUS than SWE/SE. Employing downgrade CEUS strategies resulted in negative predictive values ranging from 95.2 % to 100.0 % for BI-RADS 4a and 4b masses. Conversely, using upgrade nomogram strategies, which included the independent predictive risk factors of irregular enhanced shape, poor defined enhanced margin, earlier enhanced time, increased surrounding vessels, and presence of contrast agent retention, the diagnostic performance achieved an AUC of 0.947 with good calibration.CONCLUSION: After investigating the potential of CEUS and ES in improving risk assessment and diagnostic accuracy for nonpalpable BI-RADS category 4 breast masses, it is evident that CEUS has a more significant impact on enhancing classification compared to ES, particularly for BI-RADS 4a subgroup masses. This finding suggests that CEUS may offer greater benefits in improving risk assessment and diagnostic accuracy for this specific subgroup of breast masses.

Effect of Ultrasound Elastography on BI-RADS in Breast Mass Diagnosis

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

Application of Breast Ultrasound Imaging Report and Data System classification in diagnosis of special types of breast cancer

Combined Use of the Ultrasound Elastography and the Automated Breast Volume Scanner in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 Breast Lesions

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

The value of ultrasound elastography combined with multi-parameters in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions

Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study

The value of elastography strain rate ratio in benign and malignant BI-RADS-US 3-4 breast masses

Evaluating diagnostic significance: The utilization of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis in breast lesions

Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?

Diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound elastography combined with conventional ultrasonography for breast neoplasm

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Ultrasound strain elastography to improve diagnostic performance of breast lesions by reclassifying BI-RADS 3 and 4a lesions: a multicenter diagnostic study

The Application Value of Using Semiquantitative and Quantitative Parameters in Multimodal Ultrasound to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Value of sonoelastography for diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions and comparison with BI-RADS: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Combined Use of Shear Wave Elastography, Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique, and BI-RADS for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Synchronized with Shear Wave Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: a Diagnostic Test

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in BI-RADSUS 4B Breast Lesions

Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses

Value of Different Parameters of Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions