Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Clinical application of ultrasound elastography hardness score and area ratio in the diffierential diagnosis of breast lesions

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Evaluation Stiff Rim Sign in Breast Lesions by Shear Wave Elastography with Quantative Values

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

Ultrasonic Scores of Conventional Ultrasound and Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodular Lesions

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

Value of Combined Application of Ultrasonic Elastography and Conventional Ultrasonography in the Differen tial Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

The value of combined scoring of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography in the differential diagnosis of TI-RADS 4 nodules

The Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanning, Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesion

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

The value of ultrasound elastography combined with multi-parameters in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions

Combined Use of the Ultrasound Elastography and the Automated Breast Volume Scanner in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 Breast Lesions

Application Value of Elastosonography Ratio Method and Area Ratio Method in the Identification of Benign and Malig-nant Breast Lumps

Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.

The Application Value of Using Semiquantitative and Quantitative Parameters in Multimodal Ultrasound to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Value of Different Parameters of Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

Diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound elastography combined with conventional ultrasonography for breast neoplasm

Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Evaluating diagnostic significance: The utilization of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis in breast lesions

Effect of Ultrasound Elastography on BI-RADS in Breast Mass Diagnosis

The Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant in Mass Type Breast Diseases Based on the Real-Time Monitoring of Full-Angle Ultrasonic Shear Wave Elastography