The effect of thoracic sagittal profile on bracing effectiveness in girls with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Feng LV,Yong QIU,Xu-sheng QIU,Bin WANG,Xu SUN,Xing ZHANG,Qi DING,Ming-liang JI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2011.12.010
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of thoracic sagittal profile on bracing effectiveness in girls with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS),and its clinical diagnostic sigfinicances.Methods The clinical data from 70 cases of female patients with AIS girls treated with a standardized bracing protocol was retrospectively reviewed.Cobb angle of the thoracic curve was recorded before the bracing initiation and at the end of follow-up; furthermore,the age,menstrual status,Risser sign,and thoracic kyphosis were recorded before bracing initiation.Bracing failure was identified and confirmed once the primary curve increased more than 5 compared with the initial recorded data or surgical intervention was necessary.Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were employed to statistic the predictive factors of bracing treatment.Results The average age was 12.6 years in patients undertaking bracing initiation with a mean Cobb angle of 30.2 ± 5.5.After an average duration of 2.7 years follow up,the mean Cobb angle was changed to 29.6 ± 8.0.The procedure failed in 19 patients of all (27.1 %) and 51 cases (72.9%) had a successful outcome.Chi-square analyses revealed that the population in failure group is those with sign of higher ratios of premenarchal status,lower Risser grade,and lower age before bracing initiation in contrast to successful group.The logistic regression revealed that premenarchal status was an independent risk factor for curve progression during brace treatment,while thoracic kyphosis was not associated with the curve progression.Conclusions Most of the curve progression can be controlled by early stage of standard bracing treatment in thoracic AIS patients.The individual state of growth and development will have effect on therapeutic outcome,while the initial thoracic sagittal profile is not correlated with the treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?