Does Gender Affect the Surgical Result of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

邱勇,夏才伟,王斌,俞杨,朱泽章,钱邦平,朱锋,马薇薇
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406x.2007.07.005
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the post-operative and 1 to 3 year′s follow-up clinical results of male and female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS) patients who underwent posterior instrumentation,so as to evaluate the affection of gender on surgical treatment.Method:Fifty-six patients with Lenke Ⅰ type AIS underwent posterior instrumentation between 1999 and 2004.Thirty-five girls with mean age 15.4 years old,mean Cobb angle 58.0° and mean follow-up 22 months while 21 boys with mean age 16.0 years old,mean Cobb angle 63.2° and mean follow-up 20 months.The standing long-cassette anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of spine were taken before and after surgery and during follow-up.The Cobb angle of major curve was measured and the pre-and intra-operative parameters were recorded.Result:The mean operative time was 266 minutes for the female patients with average 10.9 instrumented levels and 258 minutes for male patients with average 10.7 instrumented levels.The intra-operative blood loss and transfusion were 1689ml and 1148ml separately in girls as well as 1343ml and 919ml in boys.The complication rates were 8.6% in girls and 19.0% in boys.Although there are slightly differences in most of radiographic and operative parameters,all of them have no significance.In female patients,the mean Cobb angle of major curves immediately after surgery was 26.4° with mean correction of 54% and the mean Cobb angle in final follow-up was 27.3° with mean correction of 46% as well as the correction loss of 4.3°.While in male patients,the mean Cobb angle of major curves immediately after surgery was 27.5° with mean correction of 56% and the mean Cobb angle in final follow-up was 29.5° with mean correction of 45% as well as the correction loss of 6.2°.Conclusion:No significant differences in radiographic and operative parameters are found between male and female patients and the gender have no significant effect on surgical treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?