Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of anterior or posterior selective thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion (ASF or PSF) on the reconstruction of sagittal profile in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Methods A total of 102 Lenke type 5 AIS patients who underwent ASF or PSF from January 2005 to December 2010 with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were retrospectively evaluated.Fifty-six patients underwent ASF,while 46 patients underwent PSF.Pre-and postoperative radiological parameters were measured as follows:curve magnitude of thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) and thoracic curve,thoracic kyphosis (TK),lumbar lordosis (LL),sacral slope (SS),sagittal vertical axis (SVA),thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis (TJK),instrumented segments angle (ISA),and proximal junctional angle (PJA).Results The mean follow-up duration was 6.1±2.1 years and 5.3±1.5 years in ASF and PSF group respectively.Preoperative radiographic parameters and demographic data showed no significant difference between two groups.The fusion levels in ASF group were shorter than that in PSF group (5.3±0.5 vs.5.9±0.8,P＜0.05),where as the distal preserved motion segments were similar between two groups (1.8±0.7 vs.1.7±0.7,P＞0.05).The correction rate of the TL/L curve was 73.2％±6.9％ in ASF group and 74.8％±10.8％ in PSF group at 3 month after surgery,with a 3.8％±8.7％ and 2.0％±0.2％ of correction loss at final follow-up.Thoracic curve was corrected spontaneously in both groups,and the correction rate of TL/L and thoracic curve was similar between two groups at final follow-up.In both groups,TK increased after surgery and increased at final follow-up compared to that after surgery (P＜0.05).LL decreased in ASF group after surgery (P＜0.05) and remained unchanged at final follow-up.In PSF group,LL remained unchanged after surgery and increased at final follow-up compared to that after surgery (P＜0.05).SS decreased after surgery in ASF group and increased at final follow-up compared to that after surgery (P＜0.05).In PSF group,SS increased after surgery and increased at final follow-up compared to that after surgery (P＜ 0.05).SVA and TJK decreased in both groups after surgery and increased at final follow up compared to that after surgery (P＜ 0.05).ISA remained unchanged after surgery and decreased at final follow-up compared to that after surgery in ASF group (P＜ 0.05).In PSF group,ISA increased after surgery (P＜0.05) and remained unchanged at final follow-up.PJA increased after surgery in both groups,and increased at final follow-up compared to that after surgery in PSF group (P＜0.05).At 3 month after surgery,LL was larger in PSF group.At final follow-up,LL,ISA and PJA was significantly larger in PSF group (P＜0.05).In ASF group,three patients had pseudarthrosis,one had rod breakage,three had adding-on phenomenon,and one had proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).In PSF group,five patients had PJK and one had adding-on phenomenon.SRS-22 scores showed no significant difference between two groups.Conclusion When Lenke type 5 AIS patients were treated with selective TL/L fusion,coronal correction could be obtained by both ASF and PSF.In sagittal plane,PSF can offer larger restoration of LL and better maintenance of lordosis in the instrumented segment than those in ASF.Additionally,the incidence of PJK in PSF group was higher than that in ASF group.

The effect of interbody cage support on the sagittal profile reconstruction after anterior selective correction in idiopathic scoliosis patients with a Lenke type 5 curve

Interbody Cage Support Improves Reconstruction of Sagittal Balance after Anterior Selective Fusion in Lenke Type 5 Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

Anterior Selective Lumbar Fusion Saving More Distal Fusion Segments Compared with Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 5: A Cohort Study with More Than 8-Year Follow-up

The Effect of Surgical Approaches on Postoperative Sagittal Profile Reconstruction Following Selective Thoracolumbar Fusion for Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The Effect of Instrumentation Patterns on the Sagittal Reconstruction Following Selective Posterior Correction for Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Surgical outcomes of anterior instrumentation and fusion for Lenke 5 AIS：a comparison between the left and right curve

Comparison of Spontaneous Correction in Thoracic Curves after Anterior Versus Posterior Selective Fusion in Lenke Type 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Selective Fusion in Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Thoracic curve correction after posterior fusion and instrumentation of structural lumbar curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The effect of radiographic parameters associated with the lowest instrumented vertebrae on postopera-tive coronal trunk balance in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The Determination of Upper Instrumented Vertebra in Anterior Selective Fusion on the Correction Outcomes of Lenke Type 5 Idiopathic Scoliosis

Cosmetic and Radiological Outcome after Surgical Treatment in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Comparison of Anterior Versus Posterior Approaches

The Outcome of Three-Dimensional Correction on Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis by Uniplanar Pedicle Screw Combined with Vertebral Derotation Technique

Fifteen Years and 2530 Patients: the Evolution of Instrumentation, Surgical Strategies, and Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in a Single Institution.

The effect of thoracic sagittal profile on bracing effectiveness in girls with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

[Clinical Study of the Cobb+1 to Cobb Fusion Strategy for Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with the Lower Lumbar Apex].

Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evolution, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications

Postoperative Lumbar Curve Progression Deteriorates Shoulder Imbalance in Patients with Lenke Type 2B/C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Who Underwent Selective Thoracic Fusion

Posterior-only Correction Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Type 5c: Differences of Strategies and Outcomes Between Adult Patients and Adolescent Patients

Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of long-term follow-up outcomes

Sagittal Profile Response of Cervical Spine after Posterior Correction in Thoracic and Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Correlation with Thoracic Kyphosis?