Clinical Outcomes of Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Zezhang Zhu,Yong Qiu,Bin Wang
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the indications of bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and evaluate its clinical outcomes. Methods 77 immatured skeleton patients suffered from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with no history of prior management. They were treated with Milwaukee or Boston brace, including 15 males and 62 females. The age of the patients at the time of bracing ranged from 10 to 15 years (mean, 12.7 years). 26 patients had double major curve, 37 had single thoracic curve, and 14 had either single thoracolumbar or single lumbar curve. The mean primary curve was 35.9°(range, 22°-62°), including curves between 20° and 35° in 37 cases and 35° in 40. Risser sign was 0 in 38,Ⅰin 19,Ⅱin 13, and Ⅲ in 7. The standing AP X-ray films were obtained at intervals of 3 to 6 months. The Cobb's angle, the apical vertebral rotation and the Risser sign were measured at initial brace application and at the latest follow-up. Results With a follow-up of 24 to 60 months (mean, 30 months), 23 patients (29.9%) were judged as curve progression. Patients with double major curve were found to have the lowest percentage of curve progression, but there was no significant difference compared with other patterns of curves. The lower the Risser sign, the higher the initial brace correction rate and the percentage of curve progression. The difference of the initial brace correction rate was significant(P0.05) between RisserⅠ(included 0) group and RisserⅡgroup, and between RisserⅠgroup and Risser Ⅲ group respectively. The initial brace correction rate in patienrts with a Cobb's angle between 20° and 35° were higher than those with a Cobb's angle 35°(P0.05), the percentage of curve progression was lower than those with a Cobb's angle 35°. 21 patients required surgical correction before completing bracing treatment because of curve progression, but in 13 of them, the surgical intervention was postponed about 12-20 months. Conclusion The Risser sign is a good predictor of bracing effect. Patients with double major curve have the lowest rate of treatment failure. The greater the amount of the Cobb's angle, the higher the percentage of curve progression. Bracing should be considered as successful if it can effectively reduce curve progression and postpone surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?