Correlations of Site of Bolus with the Image Quality in Multiple Detector-Row Spiral CT Angiography of Carotid Artery

Wu Zhen Dong,Chen Gang‐,Chen Jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2005.10.015
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To get an ideal bolus site by comparing the effectiveness of different bolus sites on the image quality of carotid artery MSCTA. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with or without clinical signs underwent the MSCTA examination with different bolus sites including common carotid artery,ascending aorta, descending aorta and common pulmonary artery in four groups(30 patients in each), the volume data acquired was used for Maximum Intensity Projection(MIP) and Volume Rendering(VR). General evaluation of image quality and enhancement of 120 carotid artery and jugular veins was conducted by two experienced radiological doctors. Comparative analysis was done among four groups of different bolus sites. Results Eleven of 30 cases of common carotid artery bolus and 7 of 30 of ascending aorta bolus were triggered unsuccessefully; all of 30 descending aorta and 30 common pulmonary artery bolus were triggered successfully; the carotid artery bifurcation level enhancement of common carotid artery, ascending aorta, descending aorta and common pulmonary artery triggered successfully was 318.1 HU, 275.8 HU, 301.2 HU, and 293.9 HU, respectively, and the enhancement of jugular veins closed to the carotid artery bifurcation level was 88.7 HU, 147.4 HU, 257.5 HU, and 91.7 HU, respectively. The carotid artery bifurcation level enhancement of unsuccessful cases of the common carotid artery and the ascending aorta was 279.6 HU, 247.4 HU respectively, and the enhancement of jugular veins close to the carotid artery bifurcation level was 285.4 HU, 74.1 HU respectively. Conclusion In group Ⅰ(common carotid artery as bolus triggering sites), there was less jugular vein circumfluence but more failure rates and limited scanning range. In group Ⅱ(ascending aorta as bolus triggering sites), circumfluence of jugular and artifacts became obvious. In group Ⅲ(descending aorta as bolus triggering sites), there was higher successful image but with serious veinous circumfluence. In group Ⅳ(common pulmonary artery as bolus triggering sites), the image was satisfied and with least veinous circumfluence. The bolus site of common pulmonary artery is preferable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?