Characteristics of Cu 6 Sn 5 grains formed on different Cu substrates under temperature gradient

Yuanyuan Qiao,Fengyun Yu,Haitao Ma,Ning Zhao,Chunying Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPT50128.2020.9202978
2020-01-01
Abstract:With the trend of miniaturization of advanced packaging technology, the number of Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> intermetallic compound (IMC) grains is decreasing and then resulting anisotropic properties in the solder joints. Therefore, how to control the orientation of Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> grains in micro solder joints has become a key issue for the reliability of 3D packaging. (001) and (011) single crystal Cu and polycrystalline Cu were specially designed as substrates to characterize the orientation evolution of Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> grains reflowing by imposing temperature gradient (TG). There exists jagged interface in Cu/Sn/Cu and (011)Cu/Sn/Cu solder joints at the cold end between Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> and solder comparing with the flat interface of (001)Cu/Sn/Cu solder joint. Rapid and directional growth of Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> grains at the cold end with preferred orientation is observed on both single Cu substrates by imposing TG, which is completely distinct from the random orientation and scallop-type Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> grains without TG. And the Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> grains grow along the c-axis lying on the (001)Cu, i.e., the <0001> directions of Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> are parallel to the interface between Cu and IMC. And the $ < 11\bar 20 > $ directions of Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> are parallel to RD, which also is the direction of the temperature gradient, i.e., ${\left\{ {11\bar 20} \right\}_{{\eta }}}$ //{001} <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Cu</inf> . The Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> grains in the (011)Cu/Sn/Cu solder joint at the cold end presents an about 30° angle with the Cu substrate. And there exists an intersecting angle about 90° between the two dominant directions. The perpendicular pairs prism-type Cu <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6</inf> Sn <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</inf> grains grow along one direction on the (001)Cu surface due to the grain boundary migration driven by the large misorientation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?