CLINICAL COMPARISON OF PRIMARY PTERYGIUM TREATED BY CRYOGENIC PLASMA AND CONJUNCTIVAL TRANSPLANTATION

Kang Chen,Xiaofeng Cai,Chi Qin,Xuqin Li,Yao Tuo,Jia Lai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19193/0393-6384_2020_3_258
2020-01-01
Acta medica mediterranea
Abstract:Objective: To compare the clinical effects of hypothermia plasma surgery (LTP) and autologous conjunctival transplantation (CAG) in the treatment of primary pterygium. Methods: 63 patients with primary pterygium treated in PLA 324 Hospital from 2013 to 2014 were divided into two groups: hypothermia plasma group (LTP group, n=30) and autologous conjunctival transplantation group (CAG group, n=33). LTP group were treated with pterygium resection combined with hypothermia plasma, and CAG group was treated with premium resection combined with autologous conjunctival transplantation. Postoperative observation: local hyperemia score, postoperative pain score, corneal epithelial healing and recurrence of the original operation site. Results: All the patients had no defect, necrosis, infection and scleral necrosis and perforation. The graft in CAG group grew well. The congestion of pterygium operation site in LTP group was significantly higher than that in CAG group on the 1st day, 3rd day and 7th day after operation, and the pain score was lower on the 1st day, 3rd day and 7th day after operation in LTP group than in LTP group at the 1st day, 3rd day and 7th day after operation (P<0.01), and the pain score in LTP group was lower than that in LTP group at the 1st day, 3rd day and 7th day after operation. There was no significant difference in the healing rate between LTP group and CAG group on the 1st day after operation (chi(2) =2.283, P=0.131). The complete corneal epithelial healing rate was higher at 3 days after operation (chi(2) =8.331, P=0.004), and all patients was completely healed in 5 days after operation. There was no significant change in the recurrence rate between LTP group and CAG group after operation. There was no change in recurrent patients treated with local drugs at 1 month (chi(2) =0.859, P=0354), 3 months (chi(2) =0.458, P=0.498), 6 months (chi(2) =0.005, P=0.945) and 1year after operation. Conclusion: The pain and corneal epithelial healing time in the early LTP group were less than those in the CAG group. The congestion in the local operation site in the CAG group was less than that in the LTP group, and the recurrence rate was not statistically significant. However, the surgical trauma in the LTP group was smaller and the cornea was smoother after operation, which was an effective new technique for the treatment of pterygium.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?