Comparison of three kinds of operation for pterygium

Wei-juan WANG,Tian-geng HAO,Xiu-ru SHI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1477.2007.11.023
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the recurrent rates be- tween three operation methods for the treatment of both primary and recurrent pterygium. Methods 84 cases (86 eyes) with pterygi- um were randomly assigned into 3 groups and operated. 74 cases (76 eyes) were primary and 10 cases were recurrent pterygium. Simple pterygium excision (A group) were adopted in 20 cases of 17 patiems with primary pterygium and 3 patient with recurrent pte- rygium. Limbal autograft transplantation(LAT, B group) were per- formed in 37 cases (38 eyes) of 5 patients with recurrent pterygium and the others with primary pterygium. Human amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT, C group) were operated in 27 cases(28 eyes) of 2 patients with recurrent pterygium and 25 (26 eyes) pa- tients with primary pterygium. The recurrent rates between three operation methods for the treatment of pterygium by chi-square test of SPSS for windows 11.5 statistics. Results The recurrent rates of the patients in group A, B, C were 30.00% ,5.26% ,7. 14% , respectively. A and B, A and C has statistical significance (P<0. 05), B and C have no statistical significance. Conclusions The recurrent rates in LAT and AMT group were lower than that of simple pterygium excision group and were effective, safe, worth be- ing popularized and applied clinically method to treat pterygium. LAT recovered limbal cellular barrier function and reconstruct the ocular surface. Limbal stem cell is the ultimate source of corneal ep- ithelium and maintain the normal corneal functions regeneration in pterygium epithelium. AMT changed the stroma of limbal stem cell.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?