Modified Sutureless and Glue-Free Method Versus Conventional Sutures for Conjunctival Autograft Fixation in Primary Pterygium Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bin Yan,Li Peng,Hanhan Peng,Shu Zhou,Baihua Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002137
IF: 3.152
2019-01-01
Cornea
Abstract:PURPOSE:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of a modified sutureless and glue-free method with those of conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery.METHODS:A prospective randomized controlled study was performed on 73 eyes with primary nasal pterygium. After pterygium excision, the bare sclera was covered with a limbal conjunctival autograft, which was fixed using a modified sutureless and glue-free method in group 1 (39 eyes) and sutures in group 2 (34 eyes). The main outcome measures were operative time, autograft stability, postoperative discomfort, autograft thickness, pterygium recurrence, and complications.RESULTS:The mean operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 (11.9 ± 1.3 minutes) than in group 2 (24.3 ± 6.1 minutes, P < 0.0001). On day 2 postsurgery, the average conjunctival autograft thickness was significantly higher in group 1 (861 ± 340 μm) than in group 2 (577 ± 287 μm, P = 0.034). Subsequently, conjunctival autograft thickness gradually decreased, with no significant difference between groups after 1 week. There were no significant differences in postoperative discomfort between groups, except for a greater foreign body sensation on day 2 and an itching sensation in 1 week in group 2 compared with group 1. Autograft side displacement occurred in 4 patients (10.3%) in group 1; 2 of these 4 developed a granuloma. There was 1 recurrence (2.9%) in group 2.CONCLUSIONS:The modified sutureless and glue-free limbal conjunctival autograft fixation method might be effective and efficient for primary pterygium surgery, with potentially decreased recurrence and postoperative discomfort.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?