Influence of Preparation Methods on the Catalytic Activity of Pd–Cu/Mn2O3 Catalyst in the Hydrogenation of 1,3-Butadiene

Tareque Odoom-Wubah,Qun Li,Min Chen,Huihuang Fang,Bernard Baffour Asare Bediako,Isroil Adilov,Jiale Huang,Qingbiao Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03216
IF: 4.1
2019-01-01
ACS Omega
Abstract:Mn2O3-supported Pd-Cu catalysts synthesized by two biogenic methods, sol-immobilization (SI) and adsorption-reduction, are compared to catalysts prepared via three conventional methods, impregnation (IP), deposition-precipitation with urea (DPU), and deposition of colloids stabilized with poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (DCPVP). The as-synthesized supported alloy catalysts of sizes between 2 and 8 nm were employed in the gas-phase selective hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene. Their alloy nature was proved from characterizations including diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy and CO adsorption tests, temperature-programmed reduction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. It was observed that the synthesis method greatly affects the final surface constituent of catalyst Pd/Cu ratio and partial particle reconstruction occurs under CO exposure. The optimum catalyst constituent of Pd-Cu-0.06-Mn2O3 was selected since it provided excellent conversion with poor selectivity to unwanted butane. Selectivity of all of the catalysts directly correlated with increasing Cu content and Pd-to-butadiene conversion. The bioreduction-supported catalysts using SI with a Pd/Cu atomic ratio of 0.9:1.4 showed excellent balances between butadiene conversion of 99.1% and selectivity to total butene above 92%, which we attribute to repulsion to H and its neighboring adsorbed inherent C and N atoms with adjacent Pd atoms and alloy synergy. The IPC catalyst showed the worst performance but was highly selective to butenes. And the DCPVP and DPU catalysts with 100% conversion produced worse 1-butene selectivity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?