Abstract:BackgroundBicarbonate (HCO 3 -) is a key indicator of anion excess or deficit and important clinically for assessing acid-base balance. For patient care, HCO 3 - may be reported as a calculated value from blood gas analysis or measured on automated chemistry analyzers. When measured, the final result includes HCO 3 -, carbonate (CO 3 2- ) and carbamino compounds and thus is reported as total CO2 (TCO 2 ). Anecdotally, some patients have discrepancies between HCO 3 - and TCO 2 . However, there is limited data in the published literature assessing agreement between the two methods. Our study aims to compare the calculated HCO 3 - values with measured TCO 2 obtained from simultaneously collected clinical specimens.MethodsThis study included all results from physician ordered HCO 3 - and TCO 2 between 01/2019 to 12/2020 retrospectively retrieved from the laboratory information system (Cerner). Specimens were collected by nursing staff within 5 minutes of each other. TCO 2 was assessed on a Roche cobas 702 (CV = 4.2%) according to the manufacturer's instructions using an enzymatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase method in lithium heparin tubes. HCO 3 - was calculated using a Radiometer ABL800 blood gas analyzer from arterial or venous blood gas samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, HCO 3 - is calculated using the Henderson-hasselbalch equation and the measurement of PCO 2 (CV= 1.75%), and pH (CV = 0.06%). Deming regression was performed. The CLIA total allowable error of 4 mmol/L and a reference change value (RCV, Cv Individual = 4%) of -13 and + 14 for TCO 2 was used to assess agreement. All data was analyzed in R.ResultsThere were 101,895 paired HCO 3 - and TCO 2 results during the study period. The values ranged from 4 to 56 mmol/L and the mean was 25.7. The mean difference between the calculated HCO 3 - and measured TCO 2 was 1.33 mmol/L. Relative to HCO 3 -, there were 2,119 (2.1%) TCO 2 results with a negative bias exceeding 4 mmol/L and 427 (0.4%)[FC1] with a positive bias exceeding 4 mmol/L. Twenty-two samples exceeded the positive RCV of 14% and 22 samples exceeded the negative RCV. Deming regression revealed a slope of 1.09 (95% CI: 1.087-1.092) an intercept of -2.19 (-2.18 to -2.06), and a Pearson correlation of 0.960 (0.959 to 0.960). We also analyzed differences between HCO 3 - and TCO 2 in arterial and venous samples. The Pearson r for venous samples was 0.956 (0.955 to 0.957) and for arterial samples was 0.966 (0.966-0.966). Deming regression revealed a slope of 1.099 (0.195 to 1.104) and 1.071 (1.068 to 1.074) for venous and arterial samples respectively. The intercept for venous samples was -1.441 (-1.559 to -1.324) and for arterial was -2.005 (-2.072 to -1.938).ConclusionsThere is bias between HCO 3 - calculations and TCO 2 measurements in simultaneously drawn samples. A small proportion of samples (2.5%) exceed the CLIA total allowable error between the results but very few exceed the RCV. This may due to differences in matrices, with different correlations and slopes observed between arterial and venous specimens. Further studies are required to distinguish the causes of the observed differences between HCO 3 - and TCO 2 .

B-029 Comparison of Electrolyte Measurement Using Laboratory Autoanalyzer and Blood Gas Analyzer

Inter-instrumental comparison for the measurement of electrolytes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Comparison of Sodium and Potassium by Point-of-Care Arterial Blood Gas Analyzer and Venous Serum by Central Laboratory Analyser in Emergency Clinical Decision Making

Comparison of Na, K, Cl, Hb and Hct values measured by blood gas analyzer and laboratory auto-analyzer / Kan gazı analiz cihazı ve laboratuvar otoanalizörü tarafından ölçülen Na, K, Cl, Hb ve Hct değerlerinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of test performance of biochemical parameters in semiautomatic method and fully automatic analyzer method

Evaluation of agreement between a noninvasive method for real-time measurement of critical blood values with a standard point-of-care device

Accuracy evaluation of Afinion AS100 hemoglobin A1c analyzer in point-to-care testing

Sodium and potassium content of 24 h urinary collections: a comparison between field- and laboratory-based analysers.

Comparison of the Results of Potassium & Sodium Determining in Mixed Serum by Different Electrochemistry Measurements

Assessment of Correlation and Concordance of GEM Premier 3000 Blood Gas Analyzer and BC-5800 Blood Cell Analyzer for Detecting Hemoglobin and Hematocrit Assessed by Bland-Altman Method

Comparative analysis of hemoglobin, potassium, sodium, and glucose in arterial blood gas and venous blood of patients with COPD

Method comparison between Alinity hq and Sysmex XT-4000i in an emergency laboratory

Comparison analysis and bias evaluation on some determination results between wet type biochemistry and dry type biochemistry analyzers

Evaluation of serum electrolytes measurement through the 6-year trueness verification program in China

A-333 Comparison between measured total carbon dioxide and calculated bicarbonate in hospitalized patients

Comparison of the accuracy of measuring blood glucose in whole blood of arteriovenous mixed blood by two kinds of blood glucose meters

Verification of a novel point-of-care HbA1c device in real world clinical practice by comparison to three high performance liquid chromatography instruments.

A-101 Is That Unexpected? Education on Handling Real World Complications with Tightly Controlled Analytes During Method Evaluation

Comparison of measurements for ALT and AST among four domestic reference laboratories

Which laboratory technique is used for the blood sodium analysis in clinical research? A systematic review

Successful Performance of Laboratory Investigations with Blood Glucose Meters Employing a Dynamic Electrochemistry-Based Correction Algorithm Is Dependent on Careful Sample Handling