Abstract:Stochastic curtailment is a valuable tool in monitoring long-term medical studies. Under this approach, one calculates the conditional power, which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis at the scheduled end of the study given the existing data at the interim analysis, along with certain speculation about the future data. The conditional power may be used to aid the decision to terminate a study prematurely or to extend a study beyond its originally planned duration. This article provides a formal and systematic investigation into the use of stochastic curtailment in the context of censored survival data. To enhance generality, we introduce a broad class of statistics that includes two-sample weighted log-rank statistics, as well as the partial likelihood score statistic for testing treatment difference with covariate adjustment under the proportional hazards model. We establish the weak convergence under both the null hypothesis and contiguous alternatives for this class of statistics when calculated repeatedly over the calendar time (i.e., time of interim analysis). Further, we derive the conditional distributions of these statistics calculated at the end of the study given all the data collected up to the interim look or given the statistics calculated at the interim look, and provide analytic expressions for the corresponding conditional powers. These results enable us to address several subtle issues involved in the definition and implementation of conditional power for censored survival data, especially when there is staggered patient entry with a potential time trend in the survival distribution, when the Gehan-type weight function is used, or when treatment is not independent of covariates. For randomized clinical trials, we show that very simple formulas can be used to calculate the conditional powers of the unweighted log-rank test (with or without covariate adjustment) under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Simulation studies demonstrate that the conditional powers for survival studies can be accurately evaluated through the proposed formulas even when the sample size is small. An illustration with data taken from a colon cancer study is provided.

Goodness-offit tests and minimum power divergence estimators for survival data

Conditional minimum density power divergence estimator for self-exciting integer-valued threshold autoregressive models

Detecting rare and weak deviations of non-proportional hazard in survival analysis

A General Theory on Stochastic Curtailment for Censored Survival Data

The Logarithmic Super Divergence and its use in Statistical Inference

Generalized Residual-Based Diagnostic Testing for Duration Models with Censoring

Testing the equality of two survival functions with right truncated data

A goodness-of-fit test for testing exponentiality based on normalized dynamic survival extropy

More powerful logrank permutation tests for two-sample survival data

Testing for Sufficient Follow‐Up in Censored Survival Data by Using Extremes

Segmental estimation and testing method for power-law distributions and some extensions

Testing for conditional independence of survival time from covariate

Goodness-of-fit inference for the additive hazards regression model with clustered current status data

Asymptotic Breakdown Point Analysis for a General Class of Minimum Divergence Estimators

Optimality of testing procedures for survival data

Comparing Survival Curves Based on Medians

Robust Regression with Density Power Divergence: Theory, Comparisons, and Data Analysis

Kernelized Stein Discrepancy Tests of Goodness-of-fit for Time-to-Event Data

Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time: Small Sample Distribution and Asymptotic Relative Efficiency

A maximum-mean-discrepancy goodness-of-fit test for censored data

Tests of fit for the power function lognormal distribution