Abstract:Comparing the survival times among two groups is a common problem in time-to-event analysis, for example if one would like to understand whether one medical treatment is superior to another. In the standard survival analysis setting, there has been a lot of discussion on how to quantify such difference and what can be an intuitive, easily interpretable, summary measure. In the presence of subjects that are immune to the event of interest (`cured'), we illustrate that it is not appropriate to just compare the overall survival functions. Instead, it is more informative to compare the cure fractions and the survival of the uncured sub-populations separately from each other. Our research is mainly driven by the question: if the cure fraction is similar for two available treatments, how else can we determine which is preferable? To this end, we estimate the mean survival times in the uncured fractions of both treatment groups ($MST_u$) and develop permutation tests for inference. In the first out of two connected papers, we focus on nonparametric approaches. The methods are illustrated with medical data of leukemia patients. In Part II we adjust the mean survival time of the uncured for potential confounders, which is crucial in observational settings. For each group, we employ the widely used logistic-Cox mixture cure model and estimate the $MST_u$ conditionally on a given covariate value. An asymptotic and a permutation-based approach have been developed for making inference on the difference of conditional $MST_u$'s between two groups. Contrarily to available results in the literature, in the simulation study we do not observe a clear advantage of the permutation method over the asymptotic one to justify its increased computational cost. The methods are illustrated through a practical application to breast cancer data.

Comparing Survival Curves Based on Medians

Nonparametric comparison of survival functions based on interval-censored data with unequal censoring.

A Nonparametric Statistical Method for Two Crossing Survival Curves

Survival Analysis with Median Regression-Models

A two-sample comparison of mean survival times of uncured sub-populations

Privacy-preserving Models for Comparing Survival Curves Using the Logrank Test

Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time: Small Sample Distribution and Asymptotic Relative Efficiency

Survival analysis under non-proportional hazards: investigating non-inferiority or equivalence in time-to-event data

Testing the equality of two survival functions with right truncated data

A nonparametric relative treatment effect for direct comparisons of censored paired survival outcomes

Covariate-adjusted Group Sequential Comparisons of Survival Probabilities

Testing for Sufficient Follow‐Up in Censored Survival Data by Using Extremes

The survival-incorporated median versus the median in the survivors or in the always-survivors: What are we measuring? And why?

Detecting rare and weak deviations of non-proportional hazard in survival analysis

Testing for sufficient follow-up in censored survival data by using extremes

Two-sample survival tests based on control arm summary statistics

Simultaneous inference procedures for the comparison of multiple characteristics of two survival functions

Restricted mean survival time for interval‐censored data

Parametric Regression Model for Survival Data: Weibull Regression Model As an Example

Comparison of baseline covariate adjustment methods for restricted mean survival time

Empirical Likelihood for the Difference of Two Survival Functions under Right Censorship