Abstract:Distinguishing power-law distributions from other heavy-tailed distributions is challenging, and this task is often further complicated by subsampling effects. In this work, we evaluate the performance of two commonly used methods for detecting power-law distributions—the maximum likelihood method of Clauset et al. and the extreme value method of Voitalov et al. —in distinguishing subsampled power laws from two other heavy-tailed distributions, the lognormal and the stretched exponential distributions. We focus on a random subsampling method commonly applied in network science and biological sciences. In this subsampling scheme, we are ultimately interested in the frequency distribution of elements with a certain number of constituent parts—for example, species with k individuals or nodes with k connections—and each part is selected to the subsample with an equal probability. We investigate how well the results obtained from low-subsampling-depth subsamples generalize to the original distribution. Our results show that the power-law exponent of the original distribution can be estimated fairly accurately from subsamples, but classifying the distribution correctly is more challenging. The maximum likelihood method falsely rejects the power-law hypothesis for a large fraction of subsamples from power-law distributions. While the extreme value method correctly recognizes subsampled power-law distributions with all tested subsampling depths, its capacity to distinguish power laws from the heavy-tailed alternatives is limited. However, these false positives tend to result not from the subsampling itself but from the estimators' inability to classify the original sample correctly. In fact, we show that the extreme value method can sometimes be expected to perform better on subsamples than on the original samples from the lognormal and the stretched exponential distributions, while the contrary is true for the main tests included in the maximum likelihood method. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.054308 ©2024 American Physical Society

Segmental estimation and testing method for power-law distributions and some extensions

Study on Probability Distributions for Evolution in Modified Extremal Optimization

Non-parametric Tests for the Tail Equivalence Via Empirical Likelihood

Estimating and Testing for Multiple Distributional Structural Breaks Via a Characteristic Function Approach

POWER-LAW DISTRIBUTIONS BASED ON EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS: LATENT SCALING, SPURIOUS ZIPF'S LAW, AND FRACTAL RABBITS

Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data

A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON ROBUST M-ESTIMATION: FINITE SAMPLE THEORY AND APPLICATIONS TO DEPENDENCE-ADJUSTED MULTIPLE TESTING

Two samples test for discrete power-law distributions

Empirical Likelihood Based Tests for Detecting the Presence of Significant Predictors in Marginal Quantile Regression

ON MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN DISTRIBUTION: AN EMPIRICAL CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION APPROACH

On the distribution of the power function for the scale parameter of exponential families

A Progress on the Shifted Power Function for Modeling Informetric Laws

Testing exponentiality based on the extropy of record values

A complete data frame work for fitting power law distributions

Size and power properties of some tests in the Birnbaum-Saunders regression model

Generalized Fisher-Darmois-Koopman-Pitman Theorem and Rao-Blackwell Type Estimators for Power-Law Distributions

An Entropy-Based Approach for Nonparametrically Testing Simple Probability Distribution Hypotheses

A new statistical distribution with applications to sports and health sciences

Distinguishing subsampled power laws from other heavy-tailed distributions

Power modified XLindley distribution: Statistical properties and applications

Power-law distributions in binned empirical data