Abstract:Statement of problem Different digital methods have been described for transferring the maxillary cast into a virtual articulator; however, its accuracy remains uncertain. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital methods. Material and methods A maxillary typodont with 5 markers was positioned into a mannequin, which was digitized by using an industrial scanner (ATOS Q) and an extraoral scan of the typodont obtained (T710). Three groups were created based on the technique used to transfer the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator (Panadent PCH Articulator): conventional facebow record (CNV group), digital photograph (P group), and facial scanning (FS group) (n=10). In the CNV group, conventional facebow records (Kois Dentofacial analyzer system) were digitized (T710) and used to mount the maxillary scan into the articulator by aligning it with the reference platform (Kois adjustable platform) (DentalCAD). In the P group, photographs with the reference glasses (Kois Reference Glasses 3.0) were positioned in the mannequin. Each photograph was superimposed with the maxillary scan. Then, the maxillary scan was transferred into the virtual articulator by using the true horizontal plane information of the photograph. In the FS group, facial scans with an extraoral scan body (Kois Scan Body) were positioned in the mannequin by using a facial scanner (Instarisa). The extraoral scan body was digitized by using the same extraoral scanner. The digitized extraoral scan body provided the true horizontal plane information that was used to mount the maxillary scan into the articulator, along with the Kois disposable tray of the scan body. On the reference scan and each specimen, 15 linear measurements between the markers of the maxillary scans and the horizontal plane of the virtual articulator and 3 linear measurements between the maxillary dental midline and articulator midline were calculated. The measurements of the reference scan were used as a control to assess trueness and precision. Trueness was analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α=.05). Precision was evaluated by using the Levene and pairwise comparisons Wilcoxon Rank sum tests. Results No significant trueness ( P =.996) or precision ( P =.430) midline discrepancies were found. Significant posterior right ( P <.001), anterior ( P =.005), posterior left ( P <.001), and overall ( P <.001) trueness discrepancies were revealed among the groups. The P group obtained the best posterior right, posterior left, and overall trueness and precision. The P and FS groups demonstrated the best anterior trueness, but no anterior precision discrepancies were found. Conclusions The techniques tested affected the accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator. In the majority of the parameters assessed, the photography method tested showed the best trueness and precision values. However, the maxillary cast transfer accuracy ranged from 137 ±44 μm to 453 ±176 μm among the techniques tested.

Effect of Abutment Tooth Geometry On The Accuracy of Fixed Prosthodontics Casts Obtained by Digital and Analog Workflows—In Vitro Study

Effect of Implant Analog Design and Additively Manufactured Casts' Printing Layer Thickness on the Linear and Angular Accuracy of Analogs for Direct Digital Workflow: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy of Three Digital Scanning Methods for Complete-Arch Tooth Preparation: an in Vitro Comparison

Effect of 3D printer, implant analog and angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts

Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing

Effect of 3D printing technology and print orientation on the trueness of additively manufactured definitive casts with different tooth preparations

Surface trueness and precision of interim restorations fabricated by digital light processing and CAD-CAM milling systems

Enhancing Fixed Partial Denture Pontic Fabrication: An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Digital and Manual Techniques

Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine

Comparative Accuracy of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Workflows for Short Span Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture Fabrication: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Virtual Edentulous Casts Created by Laboratory Impression Scan Protocols.

An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Models-An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of Accuracy of Different Print Angulations for 3D Printed Dental Crowns

The Influence of Dental Virtualization, Restoration Types, and Placement Angles on the Trueness and Contact Space in 3D-Printed Crowns: A Comprehensive Exploration

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Impression Techniques Based on an Integrated ADA Model

Build angle effect on 3D-printed dental crowns marginal fit using digital light-processing and stereo-lithography technology: an in vitro study

Comparing the Accuracy of Conventional Gypsum and 3D-Printed Dental Casts Using Three-Dimensional Analysis

In Vitro Evaluation of the Application of Digital Individual Tooth Tray in the Impression Making of Mandibular Full-Arch Crown Abutments

Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods

Positional accuracy of a single implant analog in additively manufactured casts in biobased model resin

Discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface of complete-arch cobalt-chromium implant frameworks fabricated by additive and subtractive technologies before and after ceramic veneering