Abstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:Although computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) complete removable dental prostheses (CRDPs) have gained popularity, conventional impressions are still common for CAD-CAM CRDP treatment. These need to be digitized and converted into virtual edentulous casts with a laboratory impression scan protocol during prosthesis fabrication. How this can best be accomplished is unclear.PURPOSE:The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by a dental laboratory laser scanner and a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner with a digitized master cast.MATERIAL AND METHODS:A master cast was digitized as the virtual reference cast. Ten polyvinyl siloxane impressions were made on the master cast and scanned with the dental laboratory laser scanner and CBCT scanner. The impressions were sprayed with antiglare spray and rescanned. Four groups of virtual study casts (N=40) were created from the impression scans. All virtual study casts and the reference cast were registered with surface-matching software, and the root mean square (RMS) values (representation of overall accuracy) and percentage of measurement data points within 1 standard deviation (SD) of mean RMS values (%, representation of overall reproducibility) among the 4 study groups were measured. Additionally, 95 numeric distance differences (representation of accuracy at each region) were measured in 5 distinct regions: the apex of the denture border, 6 mm from denture border, crest of the ridge, palate, and posterior palatal seal. The repeated-measures ANOVA and post hoc test (t grouping) were used to determine statistical differences (α=.05).RESULTS:The laboratory scanner group had a significantly larger RMS value (4.0 ±0.3 μm, P<.001) and smaller percentage of measurement data points within 1 SD of mean RMS value (77.5 ±1.0%, P<.001). The RMS values between the CBCT scanner (1.2 ±0.3 μm) and CBCT scanner-spray (1.1 ±0.2 μm) groups were not significantly different (P=.968), and the percentage of measurement data points within 1 SD of mean RMS values (90.1 ±1.1% versus 89.5 ±0.8%) were also not significantly different (P=.662). The numeric distance differences across 5 regions were affected by the scanning protocols (P<.001). The laboratory scanner and laboratory scanner-spray groups had significantly higher numeric distance differences at the apex of the denture border and crest of the ridge regions (P<.001).CONCLUSIONS:The CBCT scanner created more accurate and reproducible virtual edentulous casts, and the antiglare spray only significantly improved the accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by the dental laboratory laser scanner. The accuracy of the virtual edentulous casts was different across 5 regions and was affected by the scanning protocols.

Positional accuracy of a single implant analog in additively manufactured casts in biobased model resin

Effect of Implant Analog Design and Additively Manufactured Casts' Printing Layer Thickness on the Linear and Angular Accuracy of Analogs for Direct Digital Workflow: An In Vitro Study

Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine

Effect of 3D printer, implant analog and angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts

Dimensional Stability of Additively Manufactured Dentate Maxillary Diagnostic Casts in Biobased Model Resin

Accuracy of conventional versus additive cast-fabrication in implant prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Effect of Abutment Tooth Geometry On The Accuracy of Fixed Prosthodontics Casts Obtained by Digital and Analog Workflows—In Vitro Study

Effect of build orientation on the fabrication trueness of additively manufactured implant‐supported complete arch interim fixed prostheses

Comparative Accuracy of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Workflows for Short Span Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture Fabrication: An In Vitro Study

Comparing the Accuracy of Conventional Gypsum and 3D-Printed Dental Casts Using Three-Dimensional Analysis

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Virtual Edentulous Casts Created by Laboratory Impression Scan Protocols.

Positional trueness of three removable die designs with different root geometries manufactured using stereolithographic 3D printing

In vitro comparison of accuracy between conventional and digital impression using elastomeric materials and two intra‐oral scanning devices

How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer?

Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system

Digital analysis of fabrication accuracy and fit in additively and subtractively manufactured implant-supported fixed complete dentures

In Vitro Analysis of the Accuracy of the Use of Waste Zirconia Dust Compared With Optical Scanning Spray on Implant Abutment Models in Extraoral Scanning Protocol

In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings

Dimensional Accuracy of Novel Vinyl Polysiloxane Compared with Polyether Impression Materials: An In Vitro Study

Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems - An in vitro study

Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions