Effect of build orientation on the fabrication trueness of additively manufactured implant‐supported complete arch interim fixed prostheses

Amir H. Nejat,Mehmet Esad Güven,Gülce Çakmak,Burak Yilmaz,Mustafa Borga Donmez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13972
2024-10-29
Journal of Prosthodontics
Abstract:Purpose To evaluate how build orientation affects the fabrication trueness of additively manufactured implant‐supported complete arch prostheses by comparing them to subtractively manufactured high‐impact polymer‐based prostheses. Materials and Methods An edentulous maxillary model with four implants at canine and first molar regions bilaterally was digitized (ATOS Core 80 5MP) to design a reference implant‐supported complete arch prosthesis standard tessellation language file (RF‐STL). The STL file was used to manufacture prostheses additively in five different orientations according to the build platform (AM‐0, 0‐degree; AM‐15, 15‐degree; AM‐30, 30‐degree; AM‐45, 45‐degree; AM‐90, 90‐degree) or subtractively (SM‐HIP, control) (n = 10). The prostheses were digitized with an intraoral scanner (Trios 3) to generate their STLs (TF‐STL). After superimposing TF‐STLs over the RF‐STL with a metrology‐grade analysis software program (Geomagic Control X), surface deviations at four regions (overall, occlusal, overall without occlusal, and abutments), linear deviations at each abutment site, and interimplant distance deviations (canine‐to‐molar, canine‐to‐canine, and molar‐to‐molar) were calculated. One‐way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests were used for the statistical analyses (α = 0.05). Results AM‐90 mostly had the highest surface deviations, while AM‐0 had the lowest overall, and lowest overall without occlusal region deviations (p ≤ 0.022). SM‐HIP had the lowest occlusal region deviations (p < 0.001). AM‐90 had the highest linear deviations (p < 0.001). AM‐15 had higher canine‐to‐molar deviations than SM‐HIP (p = 0.042). SM‐HIP had the highest canine‐to‐canine deviations, while AM‐90 had higher deviations than AM‐0 and AM‐30 (p ≤ 0.026). AM‐45 and AM‐90 had the highest and AM‐0 had the lowest molar‐to‐molar deviations (p ≤ 0.013). Conclusions AM‐0 mostly had higher trueness and AM‐90 mostly had lower trueness within tested outcomes. Additively manufactured prostheses mostly had lower canine‐to‐molar distances and higher molar‐to‐molar distances, whereas SM‐HIP prostheses consistently had higher distances than the design file.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?