Accuracy of additively manufactured zirconia four-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by stereolithography, digital light processing and material jetting compared with subtractive manufacturing
Jörg Lüchtenborg,Evita Willems,Fei Zhang,Christian Wesemann,Florian Weiss,Julian Nold,Jinxing Sun,Fabien Sandra,Jiaming Bai,Helen Reveron,Jérôme Chevalier,Benedikt C. Spies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.026
IF: 5.687
2022-09-01
Dental Materials
Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate the manufacturing accuracy of zirconia four-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated by three different additive manufacturing technologies compared with subtractive manufacturing.MethodsA total of 79 zirconia FDPs were produced by three different manufacturing technologies, representing additive (one stereolithography [aSLA] and one material jetting [aMJ] device, two digital light processing [aDLP1/aDLP2] devices) and subtractive manufacturing (two devices [s1/s2]), the latter serving as references. After printing, additively manufactured FDPs were debound and finally sintered. Subsequently, samples were circumferentially digitized and acquired surface areas were split in three Regions Of Interest (ROIs: inner/outer shell, margin). Design and acquired data were compared for accuracy using an inspection software. Statistical evaluation was performed using the root mean square error (RMSE) and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis method with post hoc Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U tests. Bonferroni correction was applied in case of multiple testing.ResultsRegardless the ROI, significant differences were observed between manufacturing technologies (P 0.054). Likewise, no statistical difference regarding accurary was found when comparing s2 with aMJ and aSLA in most ROIs (P > 0.085). In general, mean surface deviation was< 50 μm for s1/s2 and aMJ and 100 μm and was the least accurate compared to the other additive/subtractive technologies.SignificanceAdditive manufacturing represents a promising set of technologies for the manufacturing of zirconia FDPs, but not yet as accurate as subtractive manufacturing. Methodological impact on accuracy within and in between different additive technologies needs to be further investigated.
materials science, biomaterials,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine