The Impact of Fuel and Injection Strategy on Combustion Characteristics, Emissions and Efficiency in Gasoline Compression Ignition Operation
Qian Peng,Toby Rockstroh,Carrie Hall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3990071
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:In this study, a six-cylinder heavy-duty diesel engine was operated in a gasoline compression ignition mode to investigate the influence of fuels and injection strategies on the combustion characteristics, emissions, and thermal efficiencies. Fuels, including ethanol (E), isobutanol (IB), and diisobutylene (DIB), were blended with a gasoline fuel to form E10, E30, IB30, and DIB30 based on volumetric fraction. These four blends along with gasoline formed the five test fuels. With these fuels, three injections strategies were investigated, including late pilot (LP) injection, early pilot (EP) injection, and port fuel injection/direct injection (PFI/DI or PD). Since the capability to reduce NOx emission by EP and PD is limited, the use of moderate exhaust gas recirculation fractions was also examined. Overall, the emission output, thermal efficiency, and combustion performances of the five fuels were found to be similar and their differences are modest under most test conditions. E30 with the PD injection strategy obtained the peak brake thermal efficiency (BTE) (46.9%) and gross indicated thermal efficiency (ITEg) (52.2%) at 14 bar. At 7 bar, the peak BTE (44.2%) and ITEg (52.5%) also belonged to E30 with the LP injection strategy. This could be attributed to the different roles of combustion temperature at different loads. EP showed the highest cycle-to-cycle variation, which resulted in the highest noise level among the three strategies. The second law analysis revealed that exergy destruction was mostly influenced by the fuel type and not by the injection strategy for the 14 bar operating conditions. However, the opposite trend trend was observed for the 7 bar case and the influence of moderate EGR levels on exergy destruction was found to be minor.