Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) for tooth-supported free-end dental implantation with the aid/and without the aid of fixation pins to secure the surgical template through comparison between planned, 3D printed guide position and placement implant position. Materials and methods: Thirty-two duplicated maxillary resin models were used in the present in vitro study. Digital planning was performed and fabrication of a surgical template that allowed implant placement on the distal extension edentulous site of the model (maxillary left side). A first optical scan was performed after fitting the surgical template on the model to assess the deviation at the surgical guide level. After placing implants in the model using the surgical guide, scan bodies were attached to the implants, and a second scan was performed to record the position of placed implants. The digital representations were later superimposed to the pre-operative scan and measurements of implant deviations were performed. Global (coronal and apical), horizontal (coronal and apical), depth and angular deviations were recorded between planned implant position, guide position, and placement implant position. Three-way ANOVA was used to compare implant location (#13, 14, and 15), fixation pin (with or without pin), and guide comparison (planned, guided, and placement). Results: Final implant placement based on the digital plan and based on the 3D printed guide were very similar except for depth deviation. Use of fixation pin had a statistically significant effect on the depth and angular deviation. Overall, without fixation pins and based on guide versus placement, mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm), horizontal coronal (0.55 ± 0.32 mm), and apical (1.44 ± 0.75 mm), and angular deviations (4.28 ± 2.01°) were similar to deviations with fixation pins: mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm); horizontal coronal (0.67 ± 0.22 mm) and apical (1.60 ± 0.69 mm); and angular deviations (4.53 ± 2.04°). Horizontal apical without pins (1.63 ± 0.69 mm) and with fixation pins (1.72 ± 0.70 mm) was statistically significant (p = 0.044). Depth deviation without pins (-0.5 ± 0.5 mm) and with fixation pins (-0.16 ± 0.62 mm) was also statistically significant (p = 0.005). Further analysis demonstrated that the final sleeve position on the 3D printed guide was on average 0.5 mm more coronal than the digital plan. Conclusions: The use of surgical guides with or without fixation pins can provide clinically acceptable outcomes in terms of accuracy in implant position. There was a statistically significant difference in the accuracy of implant position when utilizing fixation pins only for horizontal apical and depth deviation. Additionally, a statistically significant difference between the planned and the 3D printed surgical guide when considering the sleeve position was detected.

Accuracy of a Chairside Fused Deposition Modeling 3D-Printed Single-Tooth Surgical Template for Implant Placement: an in Vitro Comparison with a Light Cured Template

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of a Chairside, Fused Deposition Modeling Three-Dimensional-printed, Single Tooth Surgical Guide for Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Accuracy of Chair-Side Fused-Deposition Modelling for Dental Applications

Accuracy of template‐based guided dental implant placement—An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods

Comparative evaluation of accuracy of implants placed with thermoplastic and three-dimensional-printed surgical guides: A randomized controlled trial

The three-dimensional stability and accuracy of 3D printing surgical templates: An In Vitro study

Digital Versus Radiographic Accuracy Evaluation of Guided Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study

Influence of Material, Sterilization, and Disinfection on the Accuracy of Three‐Dimensional Printed Surgical Templates: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery by a CAD/CAM and Laser Scanning Technique.

How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer?

The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery

In vitro comparison of guide planes for removable partial dentures prepared with CAD-CAM-assisted templates, guiding rod templates, and freehand

Comparison of selective laser melting and stereolithography etching templates for guided endodontics

Accuracy evaluation of a universal dental implant guide for simulating implantation in posterior area on dental molds

Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides

Accuracy of Full-Guided and Half-Guided Surgical Templates in Anterior Immediate and Delayed Implantation: A Retrospective Study

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

Accuracy of Multi-Implant Impressions Using 3D-Printing Custom Trays and Splinting Versus Conventional Techniques for Complete Arches.

Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Using a Novel Structured Light Scanning System Assisted by a Planar Mirror in the Edentulous Maxilla: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy of edentulous full‐arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry