Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Evolution of Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game with the Third-Order Reputation Evaluation

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Reputation-dependent social learning on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

Reputation Evaluation with Tolerance and Reputation-Dependent Imitation on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Role of reputation constraints in the spatial public goods game with second-order reputation evaluation

The evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game with tolerant punishment based on reputation threshold

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game

Reputation preferences resolve social dilemmas in spatial multigames

Reputation-based Probabilistic Punishment on the Evolution of Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game

High-reputation Individuals Exert Greater Influence on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Reputation-Based Conditional Investment Enhances the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

How to Evaluate One's Behavior Toward ‘bad’ Individuals? Exploring Good Social Norms in Promoting Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Cooperative Emergence of Spatial Public Goods Games with Reputation Discount Accumulation

Reputation-based co-evolutionary model promotes cooperation in prisoner's dilemma game

Heterogeneous Reputation Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Information fusion based on reputation and payoff promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game.

Evolution of Cooperation in Reputation System by Group-Based Scheme

Effect of Reputation-Based Heterogeneous Investment on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Coevolution of teaching ability and cooperation in spatial evolutionary games

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games