Effects of Fe and Cr on corrosion behavior of ZrFeCr alloys in 500°C steam
Jun Wang,Hongyuan Fan,Ji Xiong,Hong Liu,Zhi Miao,Shihao Ying,Gang Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.11.014
IF: 1.7
2011-01-01
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Abstract:Research highlights Amount and size of SPP will effect the corrosion resistance of Zr alloy at 500 °C/10.3 MPa. Abstract A study of the corrosion behaviors of ZrFeCr alloy and the influence of microstructure on corrosion resistance are described by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope in this paper. The results show that several ZrFeCr alloys exhibit protective behavior throughout the test and oxide growth is stable and protective. The best alloy has the composition Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr. Fitting of the weight gain curves for the protective oxide alloys in the region of protective behavior, it showed nearly cubic behavior for the most protective alloys. The Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr has the more laves Zr(Fe,Cr) 2 precipitate in matrix and it has the better corrosion resistance. The Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr has little precipitate, the biggest hydrogen absorption and the worst corrosion resistance. The number of precipitates and the amount of hydrogen absorption in Zr alloy plays an important role on corrosion resistance behaviors in 500 °C/10.3 MPa steam. 1 Introduction Zirconium alloys are generally used as cladding and structural materials in light and heavy water nuclear reactors due to their excellent neutron economy and corrosion resistance, and good mechanical properties under irradiation ( Charquet, 2001; Sabol, 2005; Mukherjee et al., 2002 ). In China, N18 and N36 alloys have been developed on the base of Zr–Sn and Zr–Nb systems to meet the requirements of higher fuel burn-up in pressurized water reactor (PWR) ( Li et al., 2007 ). But most of used and developed zirconium alloys are suitable for 360 °C, which cannot meet the need for future high temperature water/steam reactors. Fuel cladding and other core components are expected to operate at 450–550 °C and to be subjected to a potentially corrosive environment in reactor designed for the future. But little knowledge exists of the behavior of zirconium alloys and other materials under these conditions and several candidate alloys are currently being tested for possible use in these reactors ( Jeong et al., 2003 ). Earlier work indicated that some high alloying content Zr alloys showed promise for high temperature corrosion applications ( Jeong et al., 2006; Sabol et al., 2000 ). Some researchers reported that the ferritic–martensitic alloys, such as T91, HCM12A and HT-9, have poor corrosion resistance in 500 °C supercritical water (SCW) ( Ampornrat and Was, 2007; Was et al., 2007 ). As part of a research program to assess the corrosion behavior of Zr alloys under SCW, Motta et al. (2007) have performed extensive corrosion testing of model Zr alloys under SCW (2006). They reported that proper Fe and Cr additions induce protective oxide growth in Zr alloys, such that, from the corrosion point of view, Zr alloys should be considered as possible candidate materials for application in SCW reactors. The beneficial effect of Fe has been demonstrated by comparing the corrosion resistance of the binary Zr–Cr alloys with Zr–Cr–Fe ternary alloys when the latter proved superior ( Motta et al., 2007 ). Although the effects of some elements on properties of Zr alloys have been studied widely, this is mostly for the condition of 360 °C/18.6 MPa water. There have been few systemic reports on the effect of iron and chromium on the corrosion behaviors, hydrogen absorption and microstructural change of ZrFeCr alloys in hot steam. So this study focuses on the effect of component content on these properties in 500 °C steam. 2 Experimental methods The chemical compositions of the Zr alloys used in this study are shown in Table 1 . Button ingots of approximately 50 g were prepared by arc melting under an argon atmosphere and remelted at least five times to promote the homogeneity of the as-cast structure. The arc-melted ingots were β-solution treated at 1020 °C for 30 min in a vacuum furnace, hot-rolled after preheating to 610 °C for 10 min and cold-rolled three times to a final thickness of 1 mm. Between the rolling steps, the cold-rolled sheets were intermediate-annealed at 575 °C for 3 h to obtain the fully-recrystallized structure. The final cold-rolled sheets were annealed at 510 °C for 2.5 h to obtain the partially recrystallized metallurgical form. Table 1 lists the alloys prepared and used in this study, and the target compositions. The actual compositions were measured and did not vary from the target composition. Specimens for corrosion testing, measuring 30 by 20 by 0.8 mm, were cut from the manufactured strip, mechanically ground using 1200 grit SiC paper, and then pickled in a solution of 5 vol.% HF, 45 vol.% HNO 3 and 50 vol.% H 2 O. The corrosion tests were conducted in 500 °C/1500 psi (10.3 MPa) steam in a manner consistent with the ASTM Practice (G2-88). The corrosion behavior of the specimens was evaluated by measuring the weight gain as a function of exposure time. The hydrogen absorption of alloys was detected by a hydrogen instrument set. The phase transformation temperature of the test samples was measured using a NETZSCH DSC-404C differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), and a heatup/cooldown rate of 10 °C/min was adopted. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Corrosion behavior The corrosion behavior of the Zr–Fe–Cr alloys used in this study is shown in Fig. 1 . The corrosion kinetics of the Zr alloys was compared with each other and the influence of the alloying element on the corrosion resistance of ZrFeCr was examined. Under the corrosion condition employed in this study, Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr (2-2 alloy), with the highest alloying content, showed the best corrosion resistance (protective stable oxide, low rates, no breakaway) among the alloys tested. The corrosion resistance of the Zr-4 alloy, usually used in lower temperature water reactors, has the worst corrosion resistance. The Zr-4 alloy showed the typical nodule corrosion mechanism and breakaway behavior right from the start in 500 °C/10.3 MPa condition. The Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr (1-1 alloy), with the lowest alloying content, showed the typical nodule corrosion method in 500 °C/10.3 MPa too. Motta et al. (2007) reported the Zircaloy-4, pure Zr showed breakaway behavior right from the start in 500 °C SCW and steam. The type Zr0.4Fe0.6Cr (2-4 alloy) has a good corrosion resistance at the beginning of test. But in the following stage, all the three pieces of 2-4 alloy samples were delaminated and gray oxide dropped from the aperture. The corrosion resistance curve was estimated by the depth of oxide film. The recently developed Zr alloy in China, N18 (Zr–1.0Sn–0.35Fe–0.1Cr–0.35Nb alloy) showed poor corrosion resistance in this study. The corrosion resistance of Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr (2-2) showed better than that of N18. In general, the corrosion test results showed a range of corrosion behavior depending on the alloy composition. The corroded appearance of Zircaloy samples after autoclave corrosion at 500 °C/10.3 MPa is shown in Fig. 1 . The type of Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr (1-1 alloy) shows the typical nodule corrosion at 500 °C/10.3 MPa. The oxides of the samples were loose and white in color, and these have no-protective effect. After 50 h in the test, the oxide had broken away. However, the type of Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr (2-2 alloy) showed the typical uniform corrosion at 500 °C/10.3 MPa. Even after 1300 h at 500 °C/10.3 MPa, the stable oxide film was black and shine all are, which has more protective effect. 3.2 Microstructure characterization The typical microstructures of the alloys were found to consist mainly of recrystallized grains and a small portion of the worked structure, with a high density of dislocations. Fig. 2 shows the typical distribution of precipitates in a recrystallized grain of the alloys. It shows that the precipitates are randomly distributed within the grains and along the grain boundaries in both alloys. The 1-1 alloy (Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr) has a little amount of secondary precipitates, but 2-2 alloy (Zr–1.0Fe–0.6Cr) has a large amount of secondary precipitates. The EDS indicated the precipitate is Zr(Fe,Cr) 2 -type (in Fig. 2 d). The shapes of precipitates are diversiform. To study the second-phase particle (SPP) size and distribution more quantitatively, SEM investigations were performed. Samples in transverse section were etched to reveal the SPPs in secondary electron mode. The liner component was analyzed at 10 000 times magnification. A number of fields of view were randomly chosen to obtain at least 100 particles. From these fields of view, the particle diameters were determined by image analysis. The SPP data from the SEM analysis are summarized in Table 2 . The particle number density increased with increasing ∑(Fe + Cr) content from 0.313 particles per μm 2 at 0.3 wt% ∑(Fe + Cr) to about 3.923 particles per μm 2 at 1.6 wt% ∑(Fe + Cr). Fig. 3 shows the XRD profiles of 1-1 and 2-2 alloy after a recrystallization anneal at 580 °C. The figure indicates that the main phase of 1-1 alloy is α-Zr phase. The amount of secondary precipitate in Fig. 3 is so little that it cannot be detected, but the situation is different in the 2-2 alloy. There are α-Zr and a lot of secondary precipitates, which are identified as intermetallic Zr(Fe,Cr) 2 in XRD. This is compatible with the results of SEM and EDS. 3.3 Effects of alloying elements on corrosion behavior Fig. 4 shows the XRD profiles of Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr and Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr alloy after a certain term of super hot stream corrosion in 500 °C. The XRD results indicate the oxide of Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr alloy almost was monoclinic ZrO 2 . Compared with the Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr alloy, there are not only the diffraction peaks of monoclinic ZrO 2 , but also the peaks of tetragonal ZrO 2 and α-Zr matrix, which suggest that more alloy content can stabilize the tetragonal phase in the oxide. Previous research indicated more tetragonal phase, especial in superficial interface, was beneficial to corrosion resistance ( Jeong et al., 2003, 2006; Sabol et al., 2000 ). Judging by the Zr alloy corrosion resistance in this experiment, it can be suggested that more alloy content stabilized the tetragonal phase in the oxide film and increased the corrosion resistance of the Zr alloy, which agrees with Motta's reports ( Motta, 2006; Motta et al., 2007 ). The weight gain w (mg/dm 2 ) during the initial protective regime can be characterized by a law of the type: w = A t n where t is the exposure time (in days), n is a dimensionless constant, and A is a constant whose dimensions depend on the value of n . For each of the alloys tested, these constants were determined by least squares fitting of the weight gain curves. The calculated values of A and n and the sum content of (Fe + Cr) are shown in Table 3 . The results show that the values of n are in general higher during high temperature testing. Motta et al. (2007) reported there is not much difference in the calculated values of A and n at 500 °C among the different environments (such as steam, static SCW or dynamic SCW) for a given alloy. In general the values of A are much higher (30–35) than at 360 °C (for which values of about 7–10 exist), and for the precipitate-based alloys the value of n is close to being cubic ( n = 0.33–0.37) and is somewhat higher than the values calculated for 360 °C, which are of the order of 0.2–0.25 ( Yilmazbayhan et al., 2005 ). In contrast, the Zr-4 alloys exhibit a considerably higher value of n , near 1.6. The N18 alloy shows an intermediate value of n , at 0.73. This suggests that the alloying elements have an effect on the atomic transport in the oxide layer, likely by affecting the concentrations of oxygen vacancies that are responsible for transport of oxidizing species through the layer. When the ∑(Fe + Cr) is small, for instance 0.3 (in 1-1 alloy) and 0.32 (in Zr-4 alloy), the corrosion resistance is catastrophic, and the nodule corrosion mechanism occurs But when ∑(Fe + Cr) is moderate, for example 1.6 in 2-2 alloy, the corrosion resistance is the best of all test samples. With more ∑(Fe + Cr), the alloy atom will be precipitated from α-Zr matrix in rolling process and annealing treatment because Fe and Cr have poor solubility in the α-Zr phase. Charquet (2001) suggested the predominant factor is the number of precipitates in a Zr alloy in 500 °C/10.3 MPa. So the 2-2 alloy has more laves Zr(Fe,Cr) 2 precipitate in the matrix and has better corrosion resistance. The hydrogen absorption of Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr and Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr at 500 °C/10.3 MPa are 510 ppm and 5700 ppm, respectively, detected by a Hydrogen instrument set. Table 4 shows the effect of hydrogen absorption ( H a ) on α-Zr phase to β-Zr phase transformation temperature ( T α–β ). In the annealed condition, the α → β transformation point is 837.4 and 835 °C of 0.1Cr0.2Fe and 1.0Cr0.6Fe, respectively. After corrosion in certain term in hot stream, the hydrogen absorption amount is 5700 ppm in 0.2Fe0.2Cr alloy (after 50 h in 500 °C/10.3 MPa), and the α → β transformation point was shifted to 572.5 °C form 837.4 °C in annealed condition. But in 1.0Fe0.6Cr, the hydrogen absorption amount is 780 ppm after 1300 h at 500 °C/10.3 MPa, and the α → β transformation point was shifted to 796.4 °C. The amount of hydrogen absorption of the specimen containing fine precipitates was smaller than that of the specimen containing coarse ones ( Hatano et al., 1997 ). Rudling and Wikmark (1999) suggested that large intermetallics or clusters of small precipitates could form the sites of high hydrogen flux through the oxide film. If diffusion in the metal is not sufficient to disperse the incoming hydrogen, precipitation of hydrides occurs close to the interface. Nodules are formed due to accelerated corrosion resulting from the hydride formation. The Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr cladding alloy contains the smaller precipitates, so has the more corrosion resistance. It is possible that the particle number density or volume fraction of precipitates has sufficient influence in all of the ZrFeCr alloys to avoid breakaway. The fact that the alloy with the lowest alloying element content exhibits the earliest transition, indicates that differences in precipitate distribution could play a role in stabilizing the oxide layer against breakaway. 4 Conclusions A comparative study has been conducted to address the issue of susceptibility of ZrFeCr alloys to uniform corrosion in a 500 °C/10.3 MPa stream. Four model alloys were corrosion tested for periods up to 1300 h in 500 °C/10.3 MPa and a wide range of corrosion behavior was observed. Several ZrFeCr alloys exhibited protective behavior throughout the test and oxide growth was stable and protective. The best alloy had the composition Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr. Fitting of the weight gain curves for the protective oxide alloys in the region of protective behavior showed nearly cubic behavior for the most protective alloys. The oxides were also characterized to determine the oxide structures associated with protective and non-protective behavior and the preliminary conclusions are that the protective oxides have some tetragonal phase and non-protective oxide does not. The number of precipitates and the amount of hydrogen absorption in Zr alloy play important roles in corrosion resistance behavior in a 500 °C/10.3 MPa steam. The Zr1.0Fe0.6Cr has more laves Zr(Fe,Cr) 2 precipitate in its matrix and has better corrosion resistance. The Zr0.2Fe0.1Cr contains little precipitate, and has the worst corrosion resistance. Acknowledgements This work was carried out with the financial support from The Key Nuclear Fuel and Nuclear Materials Laboratory of China, PRC , under Grant Contract No. 9140C7004040603 . And the author (J.W.) would like to thank Prof. Zhao Wenjin of The Key Nuclear Fuel and Nuclear Materials Laboratory of China and Prof. Yao Meiyi of Shanghai Univ. for their valuable discussions during the course of the research. References Ampornrat and Was, 2007 P. Ampornrat G.S. Was Oxidation of ferritic–martensitic alloys T91, HCM12A and HT-9 in supercritical water J. Nucl. Mater. 371 2007 1 17 Charquet, 2001 D. Charquet Influence of precipitate density on the nodule corrosion resistance of Zr–Sn–Fe–Cr alloys at 500 °C J. Nucl. Mater. 288 2001 237 240 Hatano et al., 1997 Y. Hatano R. Hitaka M. Sugisaki M. Hayashi Influence of size distribution of Zr(Fe,Cr)2 precipitates on hydrogen transport through oxide film of zircaloy-4 J. Nucl. Mater. 248 1997 311 314 Jeong et al., 2003 Y.H. Jeong H.G. Kim D.J. Kim B.K. Choi J.H. Kim Influence of Nb concentration in the α-matrix on the corrosion behavior of Zr– x Nb binary alloys J. Nucl. Mater. 323 2003 72 80 Jeong et al., 2006 Y.H. Jeong S.Y. Park M. Lee B.K. Choi J.H. Baek J.Y. Park J.H. Kim H.G. Kim Out-of-pile and in-pile perfomance of advanded zirconium alloys (HANA) for high burn-up fuel J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 43 2006 977 983 Li et al., 2007 Q. Li B. Zhou M. Yao W. Liu Y. Chu Corrosion behavior of zirconium alloys in super critical water at 550 °C/25 MPa 15th International Symposium on Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry June 25–28, Sunriver, Oregon, USA 2007 Motta, 2006 Motta, A.T., 2006. Advanced corrosion-resistant zirconium alloys for high burnup and generation 4 applications. International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (I-NERI-2006 Annual Report). Available from: http://www.nuclear.gov . Motta et al., 2007 A.T. Motta A. Yilmazbayhan M.J. Gomes da Silva R.J. Comstock G.S. Was J.T. Busby E. Gartner Q. Peng Y.H. Jeong J.Y. Park Zirconium alloys for supercritical water reactor applications challenges and possibilities J. Nucl. Mater. 371 2007 61 75 Mukherjee et al., 2002 P. Mukherjee P. Barat S.K. Bandyopadhyay P. Sen S.K. Chottopadhyay S.K. Chatterjee M.K. Mitra Characterisation of microstructural parameters in oxygen irradiated Zr–1.0%Nb–1.0%Sn–0.1%Fe J. Nucl. Mater. 305 2002 169 174 Rudling and Wikmark, 1999 P. Rudling G. Wikmark Effect of additives on the susceptibility of zirconium alloys to nodular corrosion J. Nucl. Mater. 256 1999 44 Sabol, 2005 G.P. Sabol ZIRLO – an alloy development success J. ASTM Int. 2 2005 2942 Sabol et al., 2000 G.P. Sabol R.J. Comstock U.P. Nayak Effect of dilute alloy additions of molybdenum, niobium, and vanadium on zirconium corrosion G.P. Sabol G.D. Moan Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry, Twelfth International Symposium, ASTM STP 1354 2000 ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA 525 Was et al., 2007 G.S. Was P. Ampornrat G. Gupta S. Teysseyre E.A. West T.R. Allen K. Sridharan L. Tan Y. Chen X. Ren C. Pister Corrosion and stress corrosion cracking in supercritical water J. Nucl. Mater. 371 2007 176 201 Yilmazbayhan et al., 2005 A. Yilmazbayhan A.T. Motta H.G. Kim Y.H. Jeong J.Y. Park R. Comstock Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors Snowbird, Utah, TMS 2005 201 210