Abstract:Criticism on the Eurocentric character of the concept of fashion has been raised already for almost four decades within fashion studies. Yet, the growing entanglement with globalization studies and postcolonial and decolonial theories has accelerated an epistemological turn within fashion studies. The epistemological turn not only fostered new research on the empirical level, it also challenged the theoretical framework of the discipline. Even the concept of fashion itself, entrenched as it is in modernization theories, has gradually come under attack. The concept of fashion has been held accountable for defining only ‘modern’ western fashion as its research object, while side-lining, even erasing, other ‘traditional’ sartorial systems. In order to redress the Eurocentric character of fashion theory and the exclusionary effects it engenders, fashion has been redefined as a ‘universalism’. Although this view became quite mainstream, in its turn it also became gradually criticized. It has been rightly argued that redefining fashion as a universalism is only another way of re-inscribing fashion scholarship in the hegemonic western ‘modern/colonial’ way of knowledge production. Studying sartorial practices positioned outside the western capitalist fashion system through the lens of fashion obscures an understanding of their own specific characteristics. In this article, I will turn more specifically towards the question of which methodologies we can mobilize if we, scholars versed in western modern knowledges and modern knowledge production, are committed to a multiplicity of sartorial worlds in as well as outside ‘the West’. The article proposes a hermeneutic–dialogical method of interpretation and translation as an epistemological as well as an ethical tool towards a more adequate understanding of ‘other’ ways of wearing, making, feeling, thinking of and living through clothes. Finally, this article offers a tentative analysis that shows what this dialogical approach might entail.

Symbols——Thing, False Image and Criticism of Popular Culture——interpretation of Fashionable System by Barthes

Culture and Symbol-Roland Barthes??Method of Textual Analysis and the Problem of Code

The Mythology of Architecture under the Control of Consumption Logic:Analyzing the Driving Power for Architecture Development in Consumer Society from a Semiotics Point of View

Fashion Photography

The Post-production Era, the Rebellion of Symbols and the Radical Critical Theory-Interpretations of Svmbolic Exchange and Death by Baudrillard

BETWEEN HISTORY AND POETICS——Mythology of Roland Barthes

Analysis of Frankfurt School's mass culture theory

Barthes and Lotman: Ideology vs culture

Signifier Fetishism: Criticisms on Consumer Social Mechanism: An Interpretation of For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign by Baudrillard

The Mirror of Production and Construction of Symbolic Ideology

To Transcend the Image's Rhetoric and Ideology——On Roland Barthes' Photography Image Theory

IMAGE BECOMES LANGUAGE: MEDIA AND CAPITALISM IN BARTHES’ RHETORIC OF THE IMAGE

Symbolic miroir's Production & symbol of Production's miroir. Or Marx &J.Baudrillard

Historical Context about Culture Industry Criticism Theory

Interpretations of the Marist Theory of Ideology by the English World

Against abstract universalisms in fashion theory: For a dialogical process of interpretation and translation

Artwork as Social Symbol:A Return from Gadamer′s Hermeneutic Perspective to Simmel′s Sociological Perspective

From Defiance to Kitsch:Anti-Americanism Narration and Contemporary Cultural Critique

An Iconographical Turn in Contemporary Cultural Criticism

Specters of Marx: on the Study of European Continental Communication

Analyzing Visual Metaphor and Metonymy to Understand Creativity in Fashion