Artwork as Social Symbol:A Return from Gadamer′s Hermeneutic Perspective to Simmel′s Sociological Perspective

Dan ZHANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-0012.2015.04.010

2015-01-01

Journal of Aesthetic Education

Abstract:In Gadamer′s hermeneutics, a work of art is a thing of transfiguration, which is open to visitors and quite differ-ent from natural objects.An artwork looks like useless for daily life but is capable of being understood.In order to obtain an understanding of an artwork, a person should make repeated attempts to communicate with it; therefore, a deeper level of understanding of an artwork can be reached only through a fusion of the horizons of the artwork and the visitors.Of course, the understanding of each artwork varies with the changes in social and historical conditions, and it′s just these varied under-standings that give the artwork its fluidity and vitality.However, an artwork is always the product of its society and inevita-bly becomes its symbol.It not only accepts but also induces and constructs a visitor′s understanding.That is to say, some perspectives of the visitors, which sometimes seem so idiosyncratic , have actually been molded by some specific social form.Therefore, we can say that an artwork transfigures according to the visitor′s understanding, because this kind of trans-figuring comes from the spirit of the age.Therefore, we should insist on the sociological perspective since Georg Simmel, and only in this way can we know how to better understand an artwork as a thing of transfiguration, which is also intelligible as a social symbol.