Signifier Fetishism: Criticisms on Consumer Social Mechanism: An Interpretation of For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign by Baudrillard

Huai-tao LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-2794.2008.07.003
2008-01-01
Abstract:In For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign,Baudrillard recognized the difference between Marx’s criticism on fetishism and his own,and made a new interpretation of fetishism.From his theory of consumer society,Baudrillard built"generalized political economics".Then by employing the methods of structural linguistics,and comparing the relationship of use value and exchange value of commodities with that of signifier and signified of signs,Baudrillard continuously made logic conversions,and finally established Signifier Fetishism as the working mechanism of consumer society.Based on his own logic,Baudrillard misunderstood Marx’s thoughts.His criticism on Signifier Fetishism thoroughly developed Debord’s Spectacle Fetishism,and the way to liberate Signifier Fetishism is a kind of romantic Utopian at the primary level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?