Abstract:Objective: Invasive lung adenocarcinoma is composed of five different histological subgroups with diverse biological behavior and heterogeneous morphology, the acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas are the most common subgroups and recognized as an intermediate-grade group. In the real world, clinicians primarily consider predominant patterns and ignore the impact of minor components in the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. The study evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics of the lepidic, solid, and micropapillary patterns as non-predominant components and whether the minimal patterns had prognostic value on acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: A total of 153 acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤4 cm were classified into four risk subgroups based on the presence of lepidic and micropapillary/solid components: MP/S − Lep + , MP/S + Lep + , MP/S − Lep − , and MP/S + Lep − groups. The Cox-proportional hazard regression model was used to assess disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The risk subgroups based on the non-predominant patterns were associated with differentiation ( P = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion ( P = 0.001), and recurrence ( P = 0.003). In univariate analysis, DFS was correlated with non-predominant components ( P = 0.014), lymphovascular invasion ( P = 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ( P = 0.001), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ( P = 0.012). In the multivariate analysis, non-predominant components ( P = 0.043) and PLR ( P = 0.032) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The 5-year survival rates of MP/S − Lep + , MP/S + Lep + , MP/S − Lep − and MP/S + Lep − subgroups were 93.1%,92.9%,73.1%,61.9%, respectively. The MP/S − Lep + subgroup had the favorable prognosis than MP/S + Lep − subgroup with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.002). As minor components, the lepidic patterns were a protective factor, and the solid and micropapillary components were poor factors. The recurrence was related to the presence of non-predominant patterns rather than their proportion. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve the prognosis of the MP/S + Lep - subgroup ( P = 0.839). Conclusions: Regardless of the proportion, the presence of micropapillary/solid components and the absence of lepidic patterns are aggressive factors of DFS in patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma.

P2.09-20 Minor Components of Solid Pattern is a Significant Poor Prognostic Factor in Pathological Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Minor histological components predict the recurrence of patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma

Solid Predominant Histologic Subtype and Early Recurrence Predict Poor Postrecurrence Survival in Patients with Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Impact of Solid Minor Histologic Subtype in Postsurgical Prognosis of Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Minor Components of Micropapillary and Solid Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma Are Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis

MA12.08 Clinicopathological Significance of Increasing Percentage of High-Grade Histological Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinomas

The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Solid Subtype in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Solid component and tumor size correlate with prognosis of stage IB lung adenocarcinoma.

Percentage of Newly Proposed High-Grade Patterns Is Associated with Prognosis of Pathological T1-2N0M0 Lung Adenocarcinoma

[Analysis of the Effect of Different Pathological Subtypes to Prognosis in Stage I Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma].

Histopathologic Pattern and Molecular Risk Stratification Are Associated with Prognosis in Patients with Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma

Distinct Prognostic Factors in Patients with Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with Radiologic Part-Solid or Solid Lesions

Micropapillary and Solid Histologic Patterns in N1 and N2 Lymph Node Metastases Are Independent Factors of Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stages II to III Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Solid Components in the Mediastinal Window of Computed Tomography Define a Distinct Subtype of Subsolid Nodules in Clinical Stage I Lung Cancers

Relationship Between PD-L1 Expression and Molecular Aberrances in Lung Adenocarcinoma with Solid Components

Predictors of Recurrence and Survival of Pathological T1N0M0 Invasive Adenocarcinoma Following Lobectomy

Prognostic impact of pattern-based grading system by the new IASLC/ATS/ERS classification in Asian patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma

Why Do Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinomas Vary from Prognosis?: a Clinicopathologic Study of 176 Patients with Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification.

Lung Adenocarcinomas Manifesting As Radiological Part-Solid Nodules Define a Special Clinical Subtype.

Prognostic Factors in Curatively Resected Pathological Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Subsolid Lung Adenocarcinomas: Radiological, Clinical and Pathological Features and Outcomes.