The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Solid Subtype in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Yang Zhang,Jing Li,Rui Wang,Yuan Li,Yunjian Pan,Deng Cai,Haichuan Hu,Hang Li,Ting Ye,Xiaoyang Luo,Yiliang Zhang,Bin Li,Lei Shen,Yihua Sun,Haiquan Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07163
IF: 4.6
2014-01-01
Scientific Reports
Abstract:A total of 1039 stage I-III invasive lung adenocarcinoma including 186 solid subtype patients who have undergone radical resection were assessed for clincopathlogic characteristics, status of common driver mutations, pattern of recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), post-recurrence survival (PRS) and predictive value for adjuvant chemotherapy and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Solid predominant adenocarcinomas were more likely to have initial distant recurrences than non-solid subtype invasive adenocarcinomas (P = 0.018). In univariate analysis, solid predominant adenocarcinoma patients had significantly worse RFS (P < 0.001), OS (P < 0.001) and PRS (P = 0.010). Multivariate analysis adjusting for clinicopathologic variables and mutational status showed that solid subtype was an independent poor prognostic factor (odds ratio = 1.876, 95% confidence interval: 1.291-3.158; P = 0.003) and an independent negative predictor for stage II-III patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio = 2.020, 95% confidence interval: 1.291-3.158; P = 0.002). In EGFR-mutated solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma patients who experienced disease recurrence, the response rate to EGFR TKIs was only 37.5%. In radically resected invasive lung adenocarcinoma, solid subtype was an independent poor prognostic factor and negative predictor for adjuvant chemotherapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?