Abstract:Background Despite promising overall survival of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, 10-25 % of them still went through recurrence after surgery. [1] While it is still disputable whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for stage I patients. [2] IASLC grading system for non-mucinous LUAD shows that minor high-grade patterns are significant indicator of poor prognosis. [3] Other risk factors, such as, pleura invasion, lympho-vascular invasion, STAS, etc. are also related to poor prognosis. [4-6] There still lack evidence whether IASLC grade itself or together with other risk factors can guide the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I patients. In this article, we tried to establish a multi-variable recurrence prediction model for stage I LUAD patients that is able to identify candidates of adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We retrospectively collected patients who underwent lung surgery from 2018.8.1 to 2018.12.31 at our institution and diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma pT1-2aN0M0 (stage I). Clinical data, manifestation on CT scan, pathologic features, driver gene mutations and follow-up information were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed utilizing the non-adjuvant cohort to predict disease free survival (DFS) and a nomogram was constructed and applied to the total cohort. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare DFS between groups. Statistical analysis was conducted by R version 3.6.3. Findings A total of 913 stage I LUAD patients were included in this study. Median follow-up time is 48.1 months.4-year and 5-year DFS are 92.9 % and 89.6 % for the total cohort. 65 patient experienced recurrence or death. 4-year DFS are 97.0 %,94.6 % and 76.2 %, and 5-year DFS are 95.5 %, 90.0 % and 74.1 % in IASLC Grade1, 2 and 3, respectively(p < 0.0001). High-risk patients defined by single risk factors, such as, IASLC grade 3, pleura invasion, STAS, less LN resected could not benefit from adjuvant therapy. A LASSO-COX regression model was built and patients are divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. In the high-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have longer DFS than those who did not (p = 0.024), while in the low-risk group, patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy have inferior DFS than those who did not ( p < 0.001). Interpretation IASLC grading is a significant indicator of DFS, however it could not guide adjuvant therapy in our stage I LUAD cohort. Growth patterns and T indicators together with other risk factors could identify high-risk patients that are potential candidate of adjuvant therapy, including some stage IA LUAD patients.

Impact of Solid Minor Histologic Subtype in Postsurgical Prognosis of Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Solid Predominant Histologic Subtype and Early Recurrence Predict Poor Postrecurrence Survival in Patients with Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Minor Components of Micropapillary and Solid Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma Are Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis

The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Solid Subtype in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Meta-analysis of Comparing Part-Solid and Pure-Solid Tumors in Patients with Clinical Stage IA Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer in the Eighth Edition TNM Classification

Solid component and tumor size correlate with prognosis of stage IB lung adenocarcinoma.

Histopathologic Pattern and Molecular Risk Stratification Are Associated with Prognosis in Patients with Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma

[Analysis of the Effect of Different Pathological Subtypes to Prognosis in Stage I Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma].

Minor histological components predict the recurrence of patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma

The presence of lepidic and micropapillary/solid pathological patterns as minor components has prognostic value in patients with intermediate-grade invasive lung adenocarcinoma

Predictors of Recurrence and Survival of Pathological T1N0M0 Invasive Adenocarcinoma Following Lobectomy

Reevaluation of Survival and Prognostic Factors in Pathologic Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma by the New 2009 TNM Classification

Multivariate Survival Analysis of Patients with Stage I NSCLC

Impact of Adjuvant Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I lung adenocarcinoma? A multi-dimensional model for candidate selection

Micropapillary or solid component predicts worse prognosis in pathological IA stage lung adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

Distinct Prognostic Factors in Patients with Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with Radiologic Part-Solid or Solid Lesions

Micropapillary and Solid Histologic Patterns in N1 and N2 Lymph Node Metastases Are Independent Factors of Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stages II to III Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Why Do Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinomas Vary from Prognosis?: a Clinicopathologic Study of 176 Patients with Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification.

Lung Adenocarcinomas Manifesting As Radiological Part-Solid Nodules Define a Special Clinical Subtype.

Impact of a Ground-glass Opacity Component on C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma