Abstract:Objective: Invasive lung adenocarcinoma is composed of five different histological subgroups with diverse biological behavior and heterogeneous morphology, the acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas are the most common subgroups and recognized as an intermediate-grade group. In the real world, clinicians primarily consider predominant patterns and ignore the impact of minor components in the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. The study evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics of the lepidic, solid, and micropapillary patterns as non-predominant components and whether the minimal patterns had prognostic value on acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: A total of 153 acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤4 cm were classified into four risk subgroups based on the presence of lepidic and micropapillary/solid components: MP/S − Lep + , MP/S + Lep + , MP/S − Lep − , and MP/S + Lep − groups. The Cox-proportional hazard regression model was used to assess disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The risk subgroups based on the non-predominant patterns were associated with differentiation ( P = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion ( P = 0.001), and recurrence ( P = 0.003). In univariate analysis, DFS was correlated with non-predominant components ( P = 0.014), lymphovascular invasion ( P = 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ( P = 0.001), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ( P = 0.012). In the multivariate analysis, non-predominant components ( P = 0.043) and PLR ( P = 0.032) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The 5-year survival rates of MP/S − Lep + , MP/S + Lep + , MP/S − Lep − and MP/S + Lep − subgroups were 93.1%,92.9%,73.1%,61.9%, respectively. The MP/S − Lep + subgroup had the favorable prognosis than MP/S + Lep − subgroup with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.002). As minor components, the lepidic patterns were a protective factor, and the solid and micropapillary components were poor factors. The recurrence was related to the presence of non-predominant patterns rather than their proportion. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve the prognosis of the MP/S + Lep - subgroup ( P = 0.839). Conclusions: Regardless of the proportion, the presence of micropapillary/solid components and the absence of lepidic patterns are aggressive factors of DFS in patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma.

MA12.08 Clinicopathological Significance of Increasing Percentage of High-Grade Histological Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinomas

Micropapillary and Solid Histologic Patterns in N1 and N2 Lymph Node Metastases Are Independent Factors of Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stages II to III Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Comprehensive Investigation of Mutational Features of Various Lung Adenocarcinoma Histological Subtypes among Chinese Patients.

Percentage of Newly Proposed High-Grade Patterns Is Associated with Prognosis of Pathological T1-2N0M0 Lung Adenocarcinoma

MA12.10 Histological Subtyping of Matched Primary and Metastases Sites in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Significance of Solid Predominance

Minor histological components predict the recurrence of patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma

Histopathologic Pattern and Molecular Risk Stratification Are Associated with Prognosis in Patients with Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma

MA01.02 Histologic Subtyping in Pathologic Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma Provides Risk-Based Stratification for Surveillance

MA12.09 Comparative Histological Subtype Analysis of Lung Adenocarcinoma Tumor and Metastatic Lymph Nodes and the Prognostic Impact

The Underlying Tumor Genomics of Predominant Histologic Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Lung adenocarcinoma: selection of surgical approaches in solid adenocarcinoma from the viewpoint of clinicopathologic features and tumor microenvironmental heterogeneity

Histologic subtyping in pathologic stage I-IIA lung adenocarcinoma provides risk-based stratification for surveillance.

Impact of High-Grade Patterns in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicentric Analysis

[Analysis of the Effect of Different Pathological Subtypes to Prognosis in Stage I Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma].

Solid Predominant Histologic Subtype and Early Recurrence Predict Poor Postrecurrence Survival in Patients with Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Predictors of Recurrence and Survival of Pathological T1N0M0 Invasive Adenocarcinoma Following Lobectomy

Lung Adenocarcinomas Manifesting As Radiological Part-Solid Nodules Define a Special Clinical Subtype.

Clinical impacts of a micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma: a review

Why Do Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinomas Vary from Prognosis?: a Clinicopathologic Study of 176 Patients with Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification.

Relationship Between PD-L1 Expression and Molecular Aberrances in Lung Adenocarcinoma with Solid Components

Impact of Solid Minor Histologic Subtype in Postsurgical Prognosis of Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma.