Abstract:Abstract In this work, the high‐strength steel (HSS) sheet dual‐phase 440 (DP440) were conducted to establish the forming limit curve (FLC) and analytical forming limit stress curve (FLSC) obtained from experimental forming limit curve. First, the Nakajima stretch forming examination was carried out to obtain forming limit curve of investigated sheet. Afterwards, the theoretical Marciniak–Kuczinsky (M–K) model was developed and calculated to evaluate localized necking limits both in strain and stress spaces combination with anisotropic yield criteria. Then, the analytical forming limit stress curves were plastically calculated by using experimental forming limit curve data combination with Swift hardening model and anisotropic yield criteria namely, Hill’48 and Yld2000‐2d for representing anisotropic plastic deformation behavior on examined steel sheet. Finally, automotive stamping parts were performed in order to verify an applicability of all developed curves. It was observed that the analytical forming limit stress curves could more precisely predict the formability of automotive parts better than the forming limit curve based on strain. Particularly, the one based on Yld2000‐2d predict better than the one based on Hill’48. Simultaneously, the experimental forming limit curve and analytical forming limit stress curve were also evaluated comparing with the theoretical calculated forming limit curve and forming limit stress curve using the Marciniak–Kuczinsky model. It should be noted again that the experimental forming limit curve and analytical forming limit stress curve are the best one. Therefore, the Yld2000‐2d yield function better represented the anisotropic behavior of the high‐strength steel sheet dual‐phase 440 than Hill′ 48 yield function, and can suitable be used for the analysis prediction and design of bumper automotive parts under forming processes.

Application of Minimum Thickness Criterion in Forecasting FLC of High-Strength Hot Rolled-Sheet Metal

Forming limit of hot-rolled high-strength steels considering sheet thickness effect

A Method for Prediction of Forming Strain for Cold Stamping Formed Head Made of S30408 Austenitic Stainless Steel

Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Sheet Metal Forming Limit Prediction with Thickness Related Criteria

Sheet metal forming limit prediction with minimum thickness criterion in numerical simulation

A New Phenomenological Model to Predict Forming Limit Curves from Tensile Properties for Hot-Rolled Steel Sheets

Formability Prediction of Advanced High Strength Steel with A New Ductile Fracture Criterion

A Forming Limit Curve (FLC)Fitting Method Considering Reliability

Numerical study on forming limit curve in sheet stamping and tube hydroforming

Sheet Metal Forming Limit Prediction with Maximum Thickness Reduction Ratio

Prediction of FLD for sheet metal by considering through-thickness shear stresses

Prediction of forming limit for sheet metals between equi-biaxial tension and uniaxial tension using a new ductile fracture criterion

Experimental Investigation on Forming Limit Predicting Model for TRIP High Strength Sheet Steels

Formability prediction of high‐strength steel sheet using experimental, analytical and theoretical analysis based on strain and stress forming limit curves and its application to automotive forming parts

Numerical prediction and experimental validation of forming limit curves of laminated half-hard aluminum sheets

Suitability of some ductile fracture criteria and yield criteria in forming limit prediction

Recent Research Advance of Application of Ductile Fracture Criteria in Sheet Metal Forming Process

A Forming Limit Curve Measurement of Sheet Metal Based on Digital Image Correlation

Predicting Sheet Forming Limit of Aluminum Alloys for Cold and Warm Forming by Developing a Ductile Failure Criterion

Influence of Thickness On The Forming Limit Curve On Low Carbon Steel With Thickness of 0.7 mm and 0.8 mm

Experimental and Numerical Determination of Hot Forming Limit Curve of Advanced High-Strength Steel