Abstract:ObjectivesTo compare the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML)–based computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion mapping for functional assessment of coronary stenosis.MethodsBetween October 2020 and March 2022, consecutive participants with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled and underwent coronary CTA, cardiac MR, and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) within 2 weeks. Cardiac MR perfusion analysis was quantified by stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). Hemodynamically significant stenosis was defined as FFR ≤ 0.8 or > 90% stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR, MBF, and MPR was compared, using invasive FFR as a reference.ResultsThe study protocol was completed in 110 participants (mean age, 62 years ± 8; 73 men), and hemodynamically significant stenosis was detected in 36 (33%). Among the quantitative perfusion indices, MPR had the largest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.90) for identifying hemodynamically significant stenosis, which is in comparison with ML-based CT-FFR on the vessel level (AUC 0.89, p = 0.71), with comparable sensitivity (89% vs 79%, p = 0.20), specificity (87% vs 84%, p = 0.48), and accuracy (88% vs 83%, p = 0.24). However, MPR outperformed ML-based CT-FFR on the patient level (AUC 0.96 vs 0.86, p = 0.03), with improved specificity (95% vs 82%, p = 0.01) and accuracy (95% vs 81%, p < 0.01).ConclusionML-based CT-FFR and quantitative cardiac MR showed comparable diagnostic performance in detecting vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, whereas quantitative perfusion mapping had a favorable performance in per-patient analysis.Clinical relevance statementML-based CT-FFR and MPR derived from cardiac MR performed well in diagnosing vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, both of which showed no statistical discrepancy with each other.Key Points• Both machine learning (ML)–based computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and quantitative perfusion cardiac MR performed well in the detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis.• Compared with stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) from quantitative perfusion cardiac MR, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) provided higher diagnostic performance for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.• ML-based CT-FFR and MPR from quantitative cardiac MR perfusion yielded similar diagnostic performance in assessing vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, whereas MPR had a favorable performance in per-patient analysis.Graphical Abstract

Assessment of myocardial ischemia by MR first-pass perfusion imaging

Evaluation the role of myocardial perfusion of MRI and MR cine in acute coronary syndrome

MRI in myocardial infarction:experimental trial and preliminary clinical report

Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease

Acute Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion: A Comparative Study of MRI with Quantitative Pathology

[Quantitative myocardial perfusion assessment with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary artery disease]

31P-MRS in Assessing Myocardial Viability in Patients with Coronary Arterial Disease

First pass perfusion and viability MR imaging in myocardial infarction model of pigs: experimental study

The ROC Analysis of MR Imaging Techniques in Evaluating Myocardial Ischemia of Pigs

High-resolution free-breathing automated quantitative myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease

3.0 T MR myocardial perfusion imaging for quantitative evaluation on coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard

Focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis both contribute to regional hypoperfusion assessed by post-processing quantitative-perfusion MRI techniques

Diagnostic efficacy of absolute and relative myocardial blood flow of stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion for detecting myocardial ischemia in patients with hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease

Assessment of myocardial infarction by magnetic resonance delayed enhancement imaging

Differentiation of myocardial ischemia and infarction assessed by dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography

Comparison of machine learning–based CT fractional flow reserve with cardiac MR perfusion mapping for ischemia diagnosis in stable coronary artery disease

A simplified method to correct saturation of arterial input function for cardiac magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: validation with simultaneously acquired PET

Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences

Clinical Application of Stress/rest Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in the Patients with 50 ％-75 ％ Coronary Stenosis

Abstract 16817: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Perfusion Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Between Different Vasodilators