Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Wellcome Trust. Background Quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (QP-CMR) is gaining importance in clinical practice due to the increasing availability of automated processing software. However, a significant obstacle in the widespread deployment of QP-CMR is the accurate estimation of the arterial input function (AIF), as this is precluded by the non-linear relationship between observed MR signal and the concentration of contrast agent. Modern solutions favour a dual-saturation acquisition sequence, acquiring specific low-resolution images with a short saturation time to minimise the signal saturation of the AIF. However, this approach is limited by the availability of the pulse sequence. Recently, the AI-AIF has been proposed (1), which uses an artificial intelligence (AI)-based correction of the AIF, without the need for a dual-sequence or dual-bolus acquisition. Purpose In this work, we compare QP-CMR values, quantified with the AI-AIF versus the invasive reference standard: fractional flow reserve (FFR), to identify diagnostically significant coronary artery disease (CAD), as defined by FFR < 0.80. Methods This study enrolled 18 patients (mean age 65 (± 11), 8 female) who underwent stress perfusion CMR (Philips Achieva 3T) and invasive FFR assessment of at least one coronary artery. Perfusion was quantified in a fully-automated manner with motion compensation (2) and AI-based segmentation and processing (3), using a Fermi function-constrained deconvolution. Fully automated pixelwise perfusion maps were generated, and further subdivided into 16 myocardial segments. Segments were assigned to their respective perfusion territory (4) and the QP value for a territory is given as the mean of its two lowest segments. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify cut-off thresholds and report the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed approach. Results The overall mean QP-CMR value was 2.29 ml/min/g (± 0.32). Figure 1 shows QP maps and FFR values for 3 example patients. The mean QP-CMR value was 2.09 ml/min/g (± 0.36) in patients with significant CAD and 2.95 ml/min/g (± 0.48) in patients without significant CAD. In total, 28 vessels underwent FFR assessment with 12 vessels in 10 patients being positive for significant CAD (FFR < 0.80). The mean QP-CMR value in FFR-positive coronary territories was 1.76 ml/min/g (± 0.37). The ROC curves are shown in Figure 2 on a per-vessel (left) and per-patient (right) level. The optimal QP threshold on a per-vessel level is 2.11 ml/min/g and on a per-patient level is 1.96 ml/min/g. Conclusion QP-CMR is feasible with the AI-AIF and does not require dual-sequence acquisition or a dual contrast injection. The QP values derived after the AI-based correction of the AIF show good agreement with FFR assessment of epicardial coronary disease. However, due to the limited sample size, further work is required to confirm these findings.

A simplified method to correct saturation of arterial input function for cardiac magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: validation with simultaneously acquired PET

Accurate Assessment of the Arterial Input Function During High-Dose Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion Using CMR with a Radial Data Acquisition: Comparison with a Dual-Bolus Method

Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification

Automated quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance with artificial intelligence-based arterial input function correction versus fractional flow reserve

Attenuation Resilient AIF Estimation Based on Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling for First Pass Myocardial Perfusion MRI

Estimation of Tissue Mixture Perfusions Using Arterial Spin Labeled Magnetic Resonance Imaging

[Quantitative myocardial perfusion assessment with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary artery disease]

Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET

Validating a local Arterial Input Function method for improved perfusion quantification in stroke

A quantitative high resolution voxel-wise assessment of myocardial blood flow from contrast-enhanced first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in a magnetic resonance compatible free beating explanted pig heart model

Comparison of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging CT to fluorescent microsphere-based flow from high-resolution cryo-images

Myocardial First‐Pass Perfusion With Increased Anatomic Coverage at 3 T Using Autocalibrated Multiband Imaging

Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion MRI Using Radial Data Acquisition: Comparison of Ktrans from Dual-Bolus and T1 Estimation Methods

Myocardial Blood Flow by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Suspected Coronary Stenosis: Comparison to PET and Invasive Physiology

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease

Optimization of Imaging Protocols for Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) Quantification with 18F-Flurpiridaz PET.

Multiparametric Cardiac 18F-FDG PET: Pilot Comparison of FDG Delivery Rate with 82Rb Myocardial Blood Flow

High-resolution free-breathing automated quantitative myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease