Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): GE Healthcare. Background Myocardial blood flow (MBF) analysis using stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD); however, evaluation of its diagnostic performance has primarily been limited to single-center studies. AQUA-MBF (Assessment of QUAntitative MBF using stress CMR) is an international study with the goal of assessing the diagnostic performance of stress MBF for the detection of CAD. In this study, we aim to determine how stress MBF assessment compared against visual analysis (VA) of stress CMR images for the detection of CAD. Methods. 144 individuals (89 (62%) men, age 62±16 years, 97 (68%) hypertension, 54 (38%) diabetes, 92 (64%) hyperlipidemia) from 9 centers who underwent dual sequence stress CMR (1.5T or 3.0T GE Healthcare) and also had either a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA, n=31), invasive coronary angiogram (ICA, n=95), or low pre-test probability for CAD (n=18) were included. CAD was defined as the presence of: (1) a stenosis ≥50% in the left main coronary artery or ≥70% in the 1 major vessel based on ICA or CTA or (2) an invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤ 0.8. Absence of obstructive coronary disease (NOCAD) was defined as a no history of myocardial infarction and stenosis <50% by ICA or CTA, 50–70% stenosis with FFR>0.8, or a young individual with no cardiac risk factors. Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed during first pass perfusion of a gadolinium-based contrast agent following the administration of adenosine or regadenoson with a low-resolution image acquired to assess the arterial input function and 2–3 short axis slices acquired to assess myocardial perfusion. VA was performed by 2 experienced cardiologists who assigned a grade of 1–5 based on the probability a study was abnormal. Stress MBF values were determined for each of the 16 myocardial segments using Fermi deconvolution (CircleCVI). The global stress MBF was calculated as the average value of two segments with the lowest values from each of the three coronary artery territories. Unpaired t-test was used to compare stress MBF values between CAD vs NOCAD. Receiver-operating characteristics curves were used to determine diagnostic performance. Results. 60 patients had CAD (20: 1-vessel, 26: 2-vessel, and 14: 3-vessel) (Figure 1A) while 84 had NOCAD (Figure 1B). The global stress MBF in CAD was lower than in NOCAD (1.63±0.52ml/g/min vs 2.41±0.68ml/g/min, p<0.0001) (Figure 2A). Stress MBF had a higher AUC than VA (reader 1 – 0.83 vs 0.73, p = 0.07: reader 2–0.83 vs 0.71, p = 0.02). The optimal stress MBF cut-off value for detecting CAD was 2.05ml/g/min (Figure 2B). Conclusions. In this multicenter study, we show that global stress MBF reported as a single value can identify patients with CAD at least as accurately as VA performed by physicians experienced in the interpretation of stress CMR images.

[Quantitative myocardial perfusion assessment with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary artery disease]

Quantitative evaluation of myocardial ischemia by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy

Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease

Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative, Semi-Quantitative, and Visual Analysis of Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: a Validation Study with Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve

High-resolution free-breathing automated quantitative myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease

Myocardial Blood Flow by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Suspected Coronary Stenosis: Comparison to PET and Invasive Physiology

Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: CZT SPECT Study

Quantification of myocardial blood flow using stress cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease

Comparison of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging CT to fluorescent microsphere-based flow from high-resolution cryo-images

Test-retest reproducibility of absolute myocardial blood flow obtained using stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging

Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences

Assessing myocardial flow reserve using CZT SPECT perfusion imaging: a step towards clinical application

Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging identifies reduced flow reserve in microvascular coronary artery disease

Focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis both contribute to regional hypoperfusion assessed by post-processing quantitative-perfusion MRI techniques

A quantitative high resolution voxel-wise assessment of myocardial blood flow from contrast-enhanced first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in a magnetic resonance compatible free beating explanted pig heart model

Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary slow flow by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography

Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease by Positron Emission Tomography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Computed Tomography

Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion Using CMR with a Radial Data Acquisition: Comparison with a Dual-Bolus Method