Comparative study of electronic lithotripsy and frequency-doubled double pulse ND:AG laser lithotripsy for pelvic and ureteral stone

纳宁,高新,蔡育彬,邱剑光
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2004.05.012
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic electronic lithotripsy (EKL) and endoscopic frequency-doubled double pulse laser lithoripsy (U100L) for pelvic and ureteral stones. Methods: From Jan. 2002 to Jun. 2003, 107 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic lithotripsy either with the Germany electronic lithotripter (54 cases) or with the Germany frequency-doubled double pulse laser lithotripter (53 cases) for the treatment of pelvic and ureteral stones. Results: The single session overall successful rate of stone fragmentation of U100L was higher than that of EKL (90.6% vs .75.9%, P0.01%), The average stonefree time was shorter for U100L (19 days vs. 35 days, P0.01), No major complication has been observed in U100L whereas 3 perforations were encountered in EKL. Conclusions: U100L is effective and safe treatment for pelvic and ureteral stones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?