Abstract:Abstract Objective: To provide evidence for selecting an appropriate peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion technique by comparing the insertion success rate and the incidence of complications with 3 PICC insertion techniques. Methods: We assigned enrolled patients to 3 groups according to the insertion technique selected by the individual patient: Group A, usual insertion technique (traditional, blind insertion); Group B, Modified Seldinger Technique (MST) insertion without ultrasound guidance; and group C, ultrasound-guided MST insertion. We compared the insertion success rate and the incidence of complications among these groups. Results: When comparing these 3 PICC insertion techniques, no significant difference was seen with respect to the insertion success rate and the incidence of catheter malposition (P > 0.05), although a significant difference existed in the incidence of bleeding at the insertion site after the PICC procedure (P < 0.05), with the ultrasound-guided MST insertion technique superior to the other 2 techniques; the incidence of mechanical phlebitis and catheter occlusion during the use of PICC had no significant difference among the 3 groups (P > 0.05); but a significant difference was seen in the incidence of thrombosis and catheter-related infections (P < 0.05), with a lower incidence in the ultrasound-guided MST insertion group than that in the other 2 groups. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided MST insertion technique may address the problems occurring in patients with poor vascular access during the PICC procedure, whereas the usual insertion technique is the best choice for patients with good vascular access and poor economic status. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate insertion technique should be based on the economic and vascular status of the individual patient in clinical practice.

The clinical effect comparative observation of 2 kinds nonintact method in PICC catheter applied by the modified seldinger technique

Puncture Point Hemostatic Effect Observation of Different Materials with Modiifed Seldinger Technique in PICC Catheter

Comparison of efficacies of upper arm placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters:using ultrasound guidance and modified Seldinger technique versus traditional method

The Effects of 3 Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion Techniques in Chinese Patients with Different Vascular Status

Transverse incision versus longitudinal incision in the implantation of PICC-port: A before-after study

Application Value of Modified Skin Expansion in PICC Catheterization under the Guidance of B-ultrasound in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients with Chemotherapy

Effect of QC Group Activity Reducing Plugging Pipe Rate in Patients with PICC During Treatemnt Period

Clinical Experience of Color Doppler Ultrasound-Guided Improved Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter

Comparison on clinical efficacy and adverse reactions between TPICC and ultrasound-guided PICC for advanced tumors: A retrospective study

Peripherally inserted central catheter in severely ill patients: A prospective,randomized,controlled study

Comparative Study of Ultrasound-Guided and Traditional PICC Catheterization in Elderly Patients

Clinical Effect of Modified Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Puncture

The curative effect analysis of peripherally inserted central venous catheter catheterization for tumor patients under the guidance of new medical guide wire

Clinical application of different approch for central venous catheterization

Disposable Circumcision Suture Device: Clinical Effect and Patient Satisfaction

Probe into the fi rst dressing change time after PICC

Feasibility analysis of external application of Xiao-Shuan-San in preventing PICC-related thrombosis

The role of lidocaine pretreatment traditional PICC puncture

Comparison on the Effect of Two Different Pressing Methods after Extraction of Venous Blood Collection Needle

Clinical study on treatment effect of Biatain non-adhesive dressing and Purilon Gel in lower extremtity venous ulcer

Clinical Comparison of Different Hemostatic Methods after Transradial Coronary Intervention