Comparison on clinical efficacy and adverse reactions between TPICC and ultrasound-guided PICC for advanced tumors: A retrospective study

Yingshan Zheng,Xia Xiang,Lixiang Li,Li Zhang,Shaoli He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000038130
IF: 1.6
2024-10-30
Medicine
Abstract:Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), is a peripheral vein puncture, catheter tip enters into central vein. Drugs are directly infused in central vein for avoiding the damage on blood vessels caused by long-term infusion or the infusions from hypertonic and irritating drugs in order to alleviate the pain caused by repeated puncture and improve the quality of life among patients, [ 1 ] which is now widely used in the chemotherapy of tumors or other diseases, [ 2 , 3 ] the parenteral nutritional pathway for adults postoperatively, [ 4 ] and the creation of nutritional pathway for preterm infants, [ 5 ] and so on. Although there are many advantages of PICC, such as avoiding the stimulation of blood vessels caused by drugs for patients who receiving oncology chemotherapy [ 6 ] and reducing the incidence of drug extravasation and the rate of unplanned extubation, etc. [ 7 ] However, some studies have confirmed that the incidence of its related complications is 16.35%. [ 8 ] During PICC intubation, due to improper operation and other reasons, patients may experience catheter separation and secondary dislodgement, resulting in unplanned extubation. The incidence of PICC-related complications not only increases the physical burden of patients, but also increases the cost of treatment. It has been found in studies that the incidence of these problems is related to various factors such as the placement position of catheter, sealing method and catheter material, etc. [ 8–10 ] Therefore, it is extremely important to improve puncture methods for effectively reducing complications and upgrading puncture effects.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?