Comparison of efficacies of upper arm placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters:using ultrasound guidance and modified Seldinger technique versus traditional method

ZHANG Xiao-ju,LU Zhen-qi,DAI Hong-qin,LU Hong,SHEN Yan-fen,FAN Yu-ying,YUAN Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2011.01.014

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacies of upper arm placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters using ultrasound guidance and modified Seldinger technique with traditional method.Methods A multicenter,randomized,and blind controlled trial was conducted in 150 patients from five cancer hospitals.The patients were randomly assigned to control group and experiment group.The success rate of PICC placement,the complications of insertion sites,mechanical phlebitis,and the comfort of insertion arms were recorded and compared immediately and on the second and seventh days with PICC-insertion,respectively.Results The successful rate of PICC placement was 100% in both groups.No significant differences were found on the incidence of hemorrhage of insertion sites and the position of PICC tips during the process of PICC-insertion between the two groups(P>0.05).There were no significant differences on the incidence of hemorrhage of insertion sites and finger swelling on the second day with PICC(P>0.05).But the incidence of mechanical phlebitis in the experiment group was significantly lower than that of control group(P<0.05).Significant differences were found on the incidence of hemorrhage of insertion sites,finger swelling,mechanical phlebitis and the degree of comfort between two groups on the seventh day with PICC(P<0.05 or 0.01).Conclusion The method of PICC insertion utilizing ultrasound guidance and modified Seldinger technique can reduce the incidence of hemorrhage of insertion sites,finger swelling and mechanical phlebitis while improve the comfort of the inserted arms in patients.