Comparison of ECG Saline-Conduction Technique and ECG Wire-Based Technique for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Giuseppe Gullo,Pierre Frossard,Anaïs Colin,Salah Dine Qanadli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030894

IF: 3.9

2024-01-31

Sensors

Abstract:(1) Background: The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is commonly used in medicine. The tip position was shown to be a major determinant in PICC function and related complications. Recent advances in ECG guidance might facilitate daily practice. This study aimed to compare two ECG techniques, in terms of their tip-position accuracy, puncture site layout, and signal quality; (2) Methods: This randomized open study (1:1) included 320 participants. One PICC guidance technique used ECG signal transmission with saline (ST); the other technique used a guidewire (WT). Techniques were compared by the distance between the catheter tip and the cavoatrial junction (DCAJ) on chest X-rays, insertion-point hemostasis time, and the extracorporeal catheter length between the hub and the insertion point; (3) Results: The mean DCAJs were significantly different between ST (1.36 cm, 95% CI: 1.22–1.37) and WT (1.12 cm, 95% CI: 0.98–1.25; p = 0.013) groups. When DCAJs were classified as optimal, suboptimal, or inadequate, the difference between techniques had limited clinical impact (p = 0.085). However, the hemostasis time at the puncture site was significantly better with WT (no delay in 82% of patients) compared to ST (no delay in 50% of patients; p < 0.001). Conversely, ST achieved optimal and suboptimal extracorporeal lengths significantly more frequently than WT (100% vs. 66%; p < 0.001); (4) Conclusions: ECG guidance technologies achieved significantly different tip placements, but the difference had minimal clinical impact. Nevertheless, each technique displayed an important drawback at the PICC insertion point: the extracorporeal catheter was significantly longer with WT and the hemostasis delay was significantly longer with ST.

engineering, electrical & electronic,chemistry, analytical,instruments & instrumentation

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the differences between electrocardiogram (ECG) saline conduction technique (ST) and electrocardiogram guidewire technique (WT) in terms of catheter tip position accuracy, puncture site layout, and signal quality during the insertion of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC). Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the performance of these two techniques in the following aspects:

1. **Accuracy of catheter tip position**: By measuring the distance (DCAJ) between the catheter tip and the cavoatrial junction (CAJ), the precision of the two techniques in positioning is evaluated.
2. **Hemostasis time at the puncture site**: Compare the time for the two techniques to achieve direct hemostasis at the puncture site.
3. **External catheter length**: Evaluate the external catheter length from the catheter joint to the insertion point to determine whether it meets the recommended standard length.

The research background indicates that the tip position of PICC is an important factor affecting its function and related complications. In recent years, the development of ECG - guided techniques may contribute to improving the efficiency of daily operations. Therefore, this study aims to systematically compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two ECG - guided techniques through a randomized controlled trial.