Cardiopulmonary Effects of Four Different Modes of Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs with Acute Lung Injury

洪群英,白春学,宋元林,方智野,钮善福
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6205.2002.01.010
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the cardiopulmonary effects of biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP), airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation(IPPV)in dogs with acute lung injury.Methods Airway pressure, hemody-namics and blood gases were measured during the four ventilation modalities with 0,0.5 and 1 kPa external end-expiratory pressure (EEP) in dogs with oleic acid-induced lung injury.Results Compared with IPPV, peak airway pressure (Ppeak) in BIPAP and APRV all decreased (P 0.05), but mean airway pressure(mPaw)decreased markedly only in BIPAP(0.5 kPa EEP,P0.05) . With the application of PEEP,PaO2 was improved in all ventilation modes,in which PaO2 in BIPAP and APRV was improved more significantly(P 0.05) .BIPAP can also improved PvO2 and reduced pulmonary vessel resistance (PVR)(P 0.05) . Although time of inspiration (Tinsp) was greatly prolonged in APRV and IRV, there is no apparent change in hemodynamics parameters(P0.05) .Conclusion Compared with IPPV,BIPAP.APRV and IRV can all decreased Ppeak. With the application of 1 kPa PEEP,PaO2 in BIPAP and APRV increased by 47.1% and 52.3% .respectively . Only BIPAP could improved PvO2, and reduced PVR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?