The Comparison Between the Continual Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation and the Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Treating Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

张孝钦,王兴祥,丁晨彦,曾蕾
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2005.16.024
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of the continual positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation with that of the bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema(ACPE).Methods 120 patients with ACPE were randomly allocated to CPAP group and BIPAP group(63 cases in CPAP group and 57 in BIPAP group).Some parameters were observed including the heart rate,breathing rate,MAP,PaO_2,PaCO_2,SpO_2,the intubation′s rate,the therapeutic efficiency rate,resolution time,EICU stay and total hospital stay.Results Resolution time and EICU stay in BIPAP group were significantly shorter than those in CPAP group〔(32.14±7.12)min vs (99.23±15.72)min,P=0.009;(36.04±4.31)h vs (49.32±3.13)h,P=0.002〕.It showed more significant improvement in BIPAP group than in CPAP group during the first 3 hour of the therapy,such as HR,R,PaO_2,PaCO_2.There were no differences between two groups in the intubation′s rate,the efficiency rate and total hospital stay(P0.05).Conclusion BIPAP is more effective in the early therapy than CPAP in ACPE,and the final therapeutic effect of the two methods is similar.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?