Cardiopulmonary Effects of Four Modes of Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs

洪群英,白春学,宋元林,方智野,钮善福
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6205.2002.04.009
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the cardiopultnonary effect of biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) .airway pressure realease ventilation(APRV), inverse ratio ventilation( IRV), and intermittent positive pressure ventilation(IPPV) .Methods Airway pressure, hemodynamics and blood gases were measured during the four ventilatory modalities with 0, 0.5,1 kPa external end-expiratory pressure (EEP) in dogs.Results In dogs without lung injury, airway pressure and mean pulmonary artery pres-sure(mPAP) during BIPAP are lowest in the four ventilation modes. Compared with IPPV,although peak airway pressure are lower during APRV and IRV, their mean airway pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure are all increased markedly.Conclusion In the four ventilation modes,BIPAP has least adverse impact on cardiopulmonary function.Compared with IPPV, APRV and IRV have no more advantage on airway pressure and hemodynamics in dogs without lung injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?