Evaluation of Kinds of Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Method

齐慧敏,辛岗,李惊子,邓利荣,张春丽,王洪源,梁国立,王海燕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:1009-9158.2002.03.007

2002-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate different methods in glomerular filtration rate measurements Methods Using clearance of 99m Tc DTPA (CL 99m Tc) as the standard method, we compared the clearance of iohexol (CLIoh), 4 hours endogenous creatinine clearance (4 h Ccr), lean body weight creatinine clearance (LBWCcr) and Cockcroft Gault creatinine clearance (CkCcr) using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, correlation and regression analysis Results The mean area under ROC curve of CLIoh, 4 h Ccr, LBWCcr and CkCcr from 35 patients were 0 98, 0 91, 0 94, and 0 89, respectively The correlation coefficients for CLIoh, 4 h Ccr, LBWCcr and CkCcr were 0 98, 0 88, 0 92 and 0 90, respectively The regression coefficients for CLIoh, 4 h Ccr, LBWCcr and CkCcr were 1 013, 0 71, 0 95, and 0 91, respectively Conclusions The accuracy of CLIoh was the best The accuracy of LBWCcr was better than that of 4 h Ccr and CkCcr LBWCcr was simple and reproducible The accuracy of 4 h Ccr was good but it yielded higher values than that of the standard method CkCcr was also good and it was the simplest method