Comparison of MDRD Equations and Creatinine Clearance for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate

马迎春,左力,王梅,王海燕
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2006.01.010
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective Endogenous creatinine clearance (Ccr) is widely used in estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR),and formulas based on plasma creatinine levels are also used increasingly.Our objective was to test whether one single formula could suffice and which one gives the best estimation of GFR.Methods 99m Tc-Diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid ( 99m Tc-DTPA) plasma clearance by dual plasma sample method(tGFR) and body surface area standardized Ccr(BSAS Ccr) have been simultaneously measured in a cohort of 175 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) within 2 years.Exclusion criteria included acute renal failure,edema,skeletal muscle atrophy or mutilation.GFRs were estimated with modified Cockcroft-Gault equation,modified BSAS Ccr,MDRD equation 7 and abbreviated MDRD equation (eGFR_2,eGFR_3,eGFR_7,eGFR_a,respectively).Using tGFR as reference standard,eGFR_2,eGFR_3,eGFR_7 and eGFR_a were compared. Results There were 86 males and 89 females, the average age was 49.36±16.14 years.The biases were lower for eGFR_7 and eGFR_a,followed by eGFR_2,eGFR_3.The precision of the estimates was the highest for GFR estimated with eGFR_7.The diagnostic accuracy of eGFR_2,eGFR_3,eGFR_7 and eGFR_a were similar.Conclusions Modified BSAS Ccr showed the worst performance in GFR estimation.Although MDRD equation 7 and abbreviated MDRD equation offered increased precision over modified BSAS Ccr,they were significantly different compared with the reference method.Modification of these equations may result in better GFR prediction when they were applied in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?