Abstract:To evaluate the effect of the number of arcs and target dose homogeneity on the dose sparing of normal tissue for stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) plans in liver cancer patients. Ten patients (4 males and 6 females) with primary or metastatic liver cancer were analyzed. Two groups of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (Group A and B) with 1 to 4 arcs (239-359°) were generated by RayStation treatment planning system and customized to the Versa HD accelerator. In Group A, the PTV dose was controlled in 90% - 120% of the prescription dose (based on RTOG 0438), and the dose homogeneity of target was not restricted in Group B. A total dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions was prescribed to the PTV. Ten rings (5 mm width for each ring) outside the PTV were created to limit the dose of normal tissue and evaluate the dose fall-off. All the plans were optimized by using an automatic optimizer developed by our team to avoid the effects of man-made factors. The dose-volume parameters, delivery time among ≥3 plans were analyzed by Friedman test and those between two values were compared by Wilcoxon signed ranks test; p < 0.05 (2-tailed, Friedman) and p < 0.05/N (2-tailed, Wilcoxon, N = n(n-1)/2, where n is the number of groups) was considered statistically significant. All the VMAT plans achieved acceptable target coverage with 43.2 Gy delivered to more than 99% of the PTV and 95% of the target receiving 48 Gy. As the number of arc increased, the doses of organs at risk (OARs, such as the mean liver dose, the maximum dose of stomach, etc.) were reduced by up to 21.5% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 17.8% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) in Group A (p < 0.008) and 23.4% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 32.2% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) in Group B (p < 0.008), while the value was only 1.38% (4 arcs vs. 3 arcs) in Group A and there was no statistic difference between 4 arcs and 3 arcs in Group B. The dose of ring 1-10 was improved when using more arcs, in which the mean dose was reduced by 9.1-13.3% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 1.5-5.1% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) for Group A and 12.3-17.2% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 0.9-3.2% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) for Group B. The gradient index (GI) was improved by approximately 14% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc) for both Group A and B (p < 0.008). The doses of OARs in Group B were improved by up to 7.5% compared to those in Group A (p < 0.05). Similarly, the value was 5.2% and 5.0% for the mean rings dose and GI (p < 0.05). The monitor units (MUs) and delivery time increased with the number of arc (p < 0.008). For 1-4 arcs VMAT plans, the median delivery time increased from approximately 3 min to 5min. The VMAT SBRT plans with inhomogeneous target dose yielded better dose fall-off and OARs sparing for liver cancer patients. Increasing the number of arcs reduced the dose of normal tissue but at the expense of more delivery time. The three arc VMAT plans without constraint of target dose homogeneity seemed to provide a good trade-off between delivery efficiency and plan quality for liver cancer SBRT.

Effect of the Number of Arcs and Target Dose Homogeneity on the Normal Tissue Sparing for SBRT Plan in Liver Cancer Patients

Dosimetric comparison in sparing normal tissue dosage by using auto-SBRT planning in oligo liver tumors

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Lung SBRT Treatment Planning: a Study of VMAT Arc Selection Guided by Collision Check Software.

Optimization of collimator angle combined island blocking with parked gap achieves superior normal tissue sparing in SBRT planning of multiple liver lesions

Influence of target dose heterogeneity on dose sparing of normal tissue in peripheral lung tumor stereotactic body radiation therapy

Serial and parallel organ‐at‐risk‐specific noncoplanar arc optimization for small versus large target volumes in liver SBRT

A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning

Hepatic Arterial Phase and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography for Dose Calculation of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Plans in Liver Cancer: a Dosimetric Comparison Study

Treatment plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using either 6-or 10-MV photon energies

Comparison of VMAT and IMRT plans for SBRT treatment of multiple liver metastases using a single isocenter

Personalized selection of unequal sub-arc collimator angles in VMAT for multiple brain metastases

Comparison of Two Rapidarc Delivery Strategies in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Stage I and Ii Peripheral Lung Tumors with Unflattened Beams

Optimization of Dose Distributions of Target Volumes and Organs at Risk During Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer with Dose-Limiting Auto-Shells.

Dosimetric comparison between IMRT and a single full arc, two full arc VMAT for postoperative cervical cancer patients

Retrospective Quality Metrics Review of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans Treating Multiple Targets Using Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Dosimetric comparison of commonly used volumetric modulated arc therapy field arrangements based on flattening filter-free beams for synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma radiotherapy

Sparing Organs at Risk with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: an Automatic Treatment Planning Study

Study On Optimal Plan Approach For Dual Arcs Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy For Oropharyngeal Cancer

Estimation of the Effect of Target and Normal Tissue Sparing Based on Equivalent Uniform Dose-Based Optimization in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

A Comparative Dosimetric Study of Left Sided Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery Treated with VMAT and IMRT