Abstract:To evaluate the effect of the number of arcs and target dose homogeneity on the dose sparing of normal tissue for stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) plans in liver cancer patients. Ten patients (4 males and 6 females) with primary or metastatic liver cancer were analyzed. Two groups of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (Group A and B) with 1 to 4 arcs (239-359°) were generated by RayStation treatment planning system and customized to the Versa HD accelerator. In Group A, the PTV dose was controlled in 90% - 120% of the prescription dose (based on RTOG 0438), and the dose homogeneity of target was not restricted in Group B. A total dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions was prescribed to the PTV. Ten rings (5 mm width for each ring) outside the PTV were created to limit the dose of normal tissue and evaluate the dose fall-off. All the plans were optimized by using an automatic optimizer developed by our team to avoid the effects of man-made factors. The dose-volume parameters, delivery time among ≥3 plans were analyzed by Friedman test and those between two values were compared by Wilcoxon signed ranks test; p < 0.05 (2-tailed, Friedman) and p < 0.05/N (2-tailed, Wilcoxon, N = n(n-1)/2, where n is the number of groups) was considered statistically significant. All the VMAT plans achieved acceptable target coverage with 43.2 Gy delivered to more than 99% of the PTV and 95% of the target receiving 48 Gy. As the number of arc increased, the doses of organs at risk (OARs, such as the mean liver dose, the maximum dose of stomach, etc.) were reduced by up to 21.5% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 17.8% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) in Group A (p < 0.008) and 23.4% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 32.2% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) in Group B (p < 0.008), while the value was only 1.38% (4 arcs vs. 3 arcs) in Group A and there was no statistic difference between 4 arcs and 3 arcs in Group B. The dose of ring 1-10 was improved when using more arcs, in which the mean dose was reduced by 9.1-13.3% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 1.5-5.1% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) for Group A and 12.3-17.2% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc), 0.9-3.2% (3 arcs vs. 2 arcs) for Group B. The gradient index (GI) was improved by approximately 14% (2 arcs vs. 1 arc) for both Group A and B (p < 0.008). The doses of OARs in Group B were improved by up to 7.5% compared to those in Group A (p < 0.05). Similarly, the value was 5.2% and 5.0% for the mean rings dose and GI (p < 0.05). The monitor units (MUs) and delivery time increased with the number of arc (p < 0.008). For 1-4 arcs VMAT plans, the median delivery time increased from approximately 3 min to 5min. The VMAT SBRT plans with inhomogeneous target dose yielded better dose fall-off and OARs sparing for liver cancer patients. Increasing the number of arcs reduced the dose of normal tissue but at the expense of more delivery time. The three arc VMAT plans without constraint of target dose homogeneity seemed to provide a good trade-off between delivery efficiency and plan quality for liver cancer SBRT.

Hepatic Arterial Phase and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography for Dose Calculation of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Plans in Liver Cancer: a Dosimetric Comparison Study

Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Radiation Treatment Planning Using CT Images Based on Different Reconstructed Field-of-view

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Feasibility of using intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans in lung cancer treatment planning

Comparison of Coplanar and Noncoplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Comparison of Helical, Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP), and Averaged Intensity (AI) 4D CT Imaging for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Planning in Lung Cancer

Dosimetric Comparison of 3DCRT, Static IMRT, and VMAT for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Hybrid Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy/Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Right Breast Cancer

Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Conventional Linac-based X-knife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Lung Cancer or Pulmonary Metastases

Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT

Effect of Contrast Media on 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Dose for Thoracic Cancer

Comparison of dosimetry between three-dimension conformal and intensity modulated plan in postoperative radiotherapy for gastric cancer

Comparative dosimetric study of h-IMRT and VMAT plans for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery

The Feasibility of Direct Treatment Planning Via Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: an Evaluation of Dose Differences Based on the Dimensional Dose Distribution Comparison Method

Comparison of VMAT and IMRT plans for SBRT treatment of multiple liver metastases using a single isocenter

Dosimetric Comparison of 192ir Sources Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy by Coplanar Template Assisted CT Guidance and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer

Dosimetry Comparison of IMRT with 3D-CRT and Simple IMRT for Breast Cancer after Radical Surgery

Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, High-dose-rate Brachytherapy and Low-dose-rate Permanent Seeds Implant for Localized Prostate Cancer

Effect of Setup and Inter-Fraction Anatomical Changes on the Accumulated Dose in CT-guided Breath-Hold Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy of Liver Malignancies.

Treatment plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using either 6-or 10-MV photon energies

Effect of the Number of Arcs and Target Dose Homogeneity on the Normal Tissue Sparing for SBRT Plan in Liver Cancer Patients