Abstract:No AccessEngineering NotesThree-Dimensional Cooperative Homing Guidance Law with Field-of-View ConstraintYadong Chen, Jianan Wang, Chunyan Wang, Jiayuan Shan and Ming XinYadong ChenBeijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Ph.D. Student, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Jianan WangBeijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA.Search for more papers by this author, Chunyan WangBeijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, People’s Republic of China‡Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Jiayuan ShanBeijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, People’s Republic of China§Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author and Ming XinUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211¶Professor, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; . Associate Fellow AIAA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:28 Oct 2019https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004681SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Jeon I. S., Lee J. I. and Tahk M. J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law for Anti-Ship Missiles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, March 2006, pp. 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.863655 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Cho N. and Kim Y., “Modified Pure Proportional Navigation Guidance Law for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 4, April 2016, pp. 852–872. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001618 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Zhang Y. A., Wang X. L. and Ma G. X., “Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Large Impact Angle Constraint,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 229, No. 11, 2015, pp. 2119–2131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410014568466 Google Scholar[4] Jung B. and Kim Y., “Guidance Laws for Anti-Ship Missiles Using Impact Angle and Impact Time,” Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2006-6432, Aug. 2006, pp. 3048–3060. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6432 Google Scholar[5] Zhang Y. A., Wang X. L. and Wu H. L., “Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Field of View Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Dec. 2014, pp. 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.10.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Polynomial Shaping of the Look Angle for Impact-Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2017, pp. 2668–2673. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002751 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Jeon I. S., Lee J. I. and Tahk M. J., “Homing Guidance Law for Cooperative Attack of Multiple Missiles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2010, pp. 275–280. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40136 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Wang X. L., Zhang Y. A. and Wu H. L., “Distributed Cooperative Guidance of Multiple Anti-Ship Missiles with Arbitrary Impact Angle Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 46, Oct. 2015, pp. 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.08.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Zhao S. Y. and Zhou R., “Cooperative Guidance for Multimissile Salvo Attack,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2008, pp. 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60171-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Zhou J. and Yang J., “Distributed Guidance Law Design for Cooperative Simultaneous Attacks with Multiple Missiles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2439–2447. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001609 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Zhang Y. A., Wang X. L. and Wu H. L., “A Distributed Cooperative Guidance Law for Salvo Attack of Multiple Anti-Ship Missiles,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1438–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2015.08.009 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Kang S., Wang J. N., Li G., Shan J. Y. and Petersen I. R., “Optimal Cooperative Guidance Law for Salvo Attack: An MPC-Based Consensus Perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 54, No. 5, 2018, pp. 2397–2410. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2816880 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Song S. H. and Ha I. J., “A Lyapunov-Like Approach to Performance Analysis of 3-Dimensional Pure PNG Laws,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1994, pp. 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1109/7.250424 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] He S. M., Wang W., Lin D. F. and Lei H. B., “Consensus-Based Two-Stage Salvo Attack Guidance,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 54, No. 3, June 2018, pp. 1555–1566. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2773272 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] He S. M., Kim M., Song T. and Lin D. F., “Three-Dimensional Salvo Attack Guidance Considering Communication Delay,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 73, Feb. 2018, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.019 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Zhao J. and Zhou R., “Distributed Three-Dimensional Cooperative Guidance via Receding Horizon Control,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2016, pp. 972–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.06.011 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Wang X. H. and Tan C. P., “3-D Impact Angle Constrained Distributed Cooperative Guidance for Maneuvering Targets Without Angular-Rate Measurements,” Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 78, Sept. 2018, pp. 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.06.014 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Wang X. H. and Lu X., “Three-Dimensional Impact Angle Constrained Distributed Guidance Law Design for Cooperative Attacks,” ISA Transactions, Vol. 73, Feb. 2018, pp. 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2017.12.009 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Si Y. J. and Song S. M., “Three-Dimensional Adaptive Finite-Time Guidance Law for Intercepting Maneuvering Targets,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2017, pp. 1985–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.04.009 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Song J. H., Song S. M. and Xu S. L., “Three-Dimensional Cooperative Guidance Law for Multiple Missiles with Finite-Time Convergence,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 67, Aug. 2017, pp. 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Wang X. F., Zhang Y. W., Liu D. Z. and He M., “Three-Dimensional Cooperative Guidance and Control Law for Multiple Reentry Missiles with Time-Varying Velocities,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 80, Sept. 2018, pp. 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.011 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Zhao J., Zhou R. and Dong Z. N., “Three-Dimensional Cooperative Guidance Laws Against Stationary and Maneuvering Targets,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2015, pp. 1104–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2015.06.003 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Jesus T. A., Pimenta L. C. A., Torres L. A. B. and Mendes E. M. A. M., “Consensus for Double-Integrator Dynamics with Velocity Constraints,” International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2014, pp. 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-013-0309-0 Google Scholar Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byTwo-Stage Cooperative Guidance Strategy with Impact-Angle and Field-of-View ConstraintsXiaoyan Yang , Yuchen Zhang and Shenmin Song25 October 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 46, No. 3Cooperative optimal guidance of hypersonic glide vehicles by real-time optimization and deep learning8 February 2023 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 0A generalized three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for various communication topologies with field-of-view constraint2 February 2023 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 30Cooperative Guidance Control with Collision Avoidance and Obstacle Dodging Mechanism29 July 2022MPPI-Based Computational Guidance for Impact Time Control with Practical Constraints24 December 2022 | International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 14Prescribed-time cooperative guidance with time delay23 November 2022 | The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 43,Consensus-Based Finite-Time Cooperative Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint22 June 2022 | International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 5Three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for intercepting hypersonic targetsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Cooperative Guidance Law With Impact Angle Coordination: A Nash ApproachIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 5Prescribed Impact Time Cooperative Guidance Law with Seeker’s Field of View ConstraintCooperative Circular Guidance with Nonuniform Field-of-View ConstraintsYadong Chen, Daqing Guo, Jianan Wang , Jiayuan Shan and Ming Xin 31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Unified Method for Field-of-View-Limited Homing GuidanceWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang , Hungsun Son and Ming Xin 17 April 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Nonlinear Guidance Laws for Maneuvering Target Interception With Virtual Look Angle ConstraintIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 4Evaluation Model, Intelligent Assignment, and Cooperative Interception in Multimissile and Multitarget EngagementIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 4Adaptive event-triggered distributed optimal guidance design via adaptive dynamic programmingChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 7Nonlinear modified bias proportional navigation guidance law against maneuvering targetsJournal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 359, No. 7Impact time and angle constrained guidance via range‐based line‐of‐sight shaping8 February 2022 | International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 32, No. 6Fixed-Time Terminal Angle-Constrained Cooperative Guidance Law Against Maneuvering TargetIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Cooperative guidance laws against highly maneuvering target with impact time and angle15 June 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 5Three-Dimensional Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Field-of-View Constraint and Velocity Variation9 April 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 4Prescribed-Time Cooperative Guidance Law against Maneuvering Target with Input Saturation26 January 2022 | International Journal of ControlNonlinear Impact Angle Constrained Guidance Law Design via the SDRE Method30 October 2021Three-Dimensional Nonsingular Cooperative Guidance Law with Different Field-of-View ConstraintsWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Three-dimensional consensus algorithm for nonsingular distributed cooperative guidance strategyAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 118Guidance Law Design with Fixed-Time Convergent Error DynamicsChunyan Wang, Wei Dong , Jianan Wang, Jiayuan Shan and Ming Xin 10 May 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 7Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Cooperative Salvo Using Event-Triggered StrategyAbhinav Sinha, Shashi Ranjan Kumar and Dwaipayan Mukherjee24 November 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 2A New Optimal Guidance Law with Impact Time and Angle Constraints Based on Sequential Convex ProgrammingMathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2021Three-Dimensional Fixed-Time Cooperative Guidance Law With Impact Angle Constraint and Prespecified Impact TimeIEEE Access, Vol. 9Distributed Analytical Formation Control and Cooperative Guidance for Gliding VehiclesInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2020Consensus Based Cooperative Guidance with a LeaderA robust three-dimensional cooperative guidance law against maneuvering targetJournal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 357, No. 10 What's Popular Volume 43, Number 2February 2020 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2019 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsBallistic MissileControl TheoryFeedback ControlGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsHoming GuidanceMissile Guidance and ControlMissile Systems, Dynamics and TechnologyMissilesNavigational Guidance KeywordsHoming GuidanceControl GuidanceConsensus AlgorithmMissile SystemsModel Predictive ControlNumerical SimulationMulti Agent SystemProportional NavigationFeedback LinearizationCommand MissileAcknowledgmentThis work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61873031 and 61803032.PDF Received29 June 2019Accepted23 September 2019Published online28 October 2019

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteOptimal Strategies for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in a Pursuit/Evasion Differential GameXiaoqian Wei and Jianying YangXiaoqian WeiPeking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China and Jianying YangPeking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaPublished Online:4 Jun 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003480SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Sprinkle J., Eklund J. M., Kim H. J. and Sastry S., “Encoding Aerial Pursuit/Evasion Games with Fixed Wing Aircraft into a Nonlinear Model Predictive Tracking Controller,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 3, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2004, pp. 2609–2614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2004.1428851 Google Scholar[2] Scott W. and Leonard N. E., “Pursuit, Herding and Evasion: A Three-Agent Model of Caribou Predation,” American Control Conference, IEEE Publ., Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 2978–2983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6580287 Google Scholar[3] Earl M. G. and D'Andrea R., “A Decomposition Approach to Multi-Vehicle Cooperative Control,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2005, pp. 276–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2006.11.002 RASOEJ 0921-8890 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Shaferman V. and Shima T., “Cooperative Multiple-Model Adaptive Guidance for an Aircraft Defending Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1801–1813. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.49515 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Garcia E., Casbeer D. W. and Pachter M., “Active Target Defense Using First Order Missile Models,” Automatica, Vol. 78, April 2017, pp. 139–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.12.032 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Gutman S., Goldan O. and Rubinsky S., “Guaranteed Miss Distance in Guidance Systems with Bounded Controls and Bounded Noise,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2012, pp. 816–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55723 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Boyell R. L., “Defending a Moving Target Against Missile or Torpedo Attack,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-12, No. 4, 1976, pp. 522–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1976.308338 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Rubinsky S. and Gutman S., “Three-Player Pursuit and Evasion Conflict,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2014, pp. 98–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.61832 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Shima T., “Optimal Cooperative Pursuit and Evasion Strategies Against a Homing Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2012, pp. 414–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51765 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Prokopov O. and Shima T., “Linear Quadratic Optimal Cooperative Strategies for Active Aircraft Protection,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2013, pp. 753–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.58531 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Li D. and Cruz J. B., “Defending an Asset: A Linear Quadratic Game Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2011, pp. 1026–1044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2011.5751240 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Ratnoo A. and Shima T., “Line-of-Sight Interceptor Guidance for Defending an Aircraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2012, pp. 522–532. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50572 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Garcia E., Casbeer D. W. and Pachter M., “Escape Regions of the Active Target Defense Differential Game,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, ASME Paper DSCC2015-9628, Columbus, OH, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2015-9628 Google Scholar[14] Casbeer D. W., Garcia E. and Pachter M., “The Target Differential Game with Two Defenders,” International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2016, pp. 202–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2016.7502560 Google Scholar[15] Oyler D. W., Kabamba P. T. and Girard A. R., “Pursuit—Evasion Games in the Presence of Obstacles,” Automatica, Vol. 65, March 2016, pp. 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.11.018 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Perelman A., Shima T. and Rusnak I., “Cooperative Differential Games Strategies for Active Aircraft Protection from a Homing Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2011, pp. 761–773. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51611 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Ratnoo A. and Shima T., “Guidance Strategies Against Defended Aerial Targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1059–1068. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56924 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Yamasaki T., Balakrishnan S. N. and Takano H., “Modified Command to Line-of-Sight Intercept Guidance for Aircraft Defense,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2013, pp. 898–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.58566 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Garcia E., Casbeer D. W. and Pachter M., “Cooperative Strategies for Optimal Aircraft Defense from an Attacking Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1510–1520. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001083 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] Li D., Cruz J. B., Chen G. and Kwan C., “A Hierarchical Approach to Multi-Player Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 18, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2005, pp. 5674–5679. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2005.1583067 Google Scholar[21] Wei M., Chen G., Cruz J. B., Haynes L., Pham K. and Blasch E., “Multi-Pursuer Multi-Evader Pursuit-Evasion Games with Jamming Confrontation,” Journal of Aerospace Computing Information and Communication, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2009, pp. 693–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25329 LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Lin W., Qu Z. and Simaan M. A., “Nash Strategies for Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games Involving Limited Observations,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1347–1356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2014.130569 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Ibragimov G. I. and Salimi M., “Pursuit-Evasion Differential Game with Many Inertial Players,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2009, 2009, Article 653723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/653723 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[24] Salimi M., “A Research Contribution on an Evasion Problem,” SeMA Journal, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2018, pp. 139–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-017-0122-4 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Sun S., Zhang Q., Loxton R. and Li B., “Numerical Solution of a Pursuit-Evasion Differential Game Involving Two Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbit,” Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2015, pp. 1127–1147. doi:https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo CrossrefGoogle Scholar[26] Li D., Cruz J. B. and Schumacher C. J., “Stochastic Multi-Player Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2008, pp. 218–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1239 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[27] Raboin E., Kuter U. and Nau D., “Generating Strategies for Multi-Agent Pursuit-Evasion Games in Partially Observable Euclidean Space,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 3, Richland, SC, 2012, pp. 1201–1202. Google Scholar[28] Isaacs R., “Games of Pursuit,” Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA, 1951. Google Scholar[29] Isaacs R., Differential Games. A Mathematical Theory with Application to Warfare and Pursuit, Control and Optimization, 1st ed., Wiley, New York, 1965, Chap. 3. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byJustification of the geometric solution of a target defense game with faster defenders and a convex target area using the HJI equationAutomatica, Vol. 149Intelligent Game Strategies in Target-Missile-Defender Engagement Using Curriculum-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning31 January 2023 | Aerospace, Vol. 10, No. 2Optimal-Damage-Effectiveness Cooperative-Control Strategy for the Pursuit–Evasion Problem with Multiple Guided Missiles30 November 2022 | Sensors, Vol. 22, No. 23Cooperative strategy for pursuit-evasion problem with collision avoidanceOcean Engineering, Vol. 266Cooperative guidance laws for interception of active maneuvering target under information symmetric and asymmetric conditions11 November 2022 | International Journal of Control, Vol. 84Deployment Optimization of Defense Stations in an Attack-Defense Aerial War Game25 October 2022 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 21Quick identification of guidance law for an incoming missile using multiple-model mechanismChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 9Multi-missile interception for multi-targets: Dynamic situation assessment, target allocation and cooperative interception in groupsJournal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 359, No. 12Cooperative Hunting Strategy with a Superior Evader Based on Differential GameComplexity, Vol. 2022Self-Organizing Cooperative Pursuit Strategy for Multi-USV with Dynamic Obstacle Ships20 April 2022 | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 5Optimal deployment of swarm positions in cooperative interception of multiple UAV swarmsDigital Communications and Networks, Vol. 72On the Strategies of Defending a Target against Multiple IntrudersHan Fu and Hugh H. Liu4 January 2021Distributed cooperative encirclement hunting guidance for multiple flight vehicles systemAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 95An Integral Evasion and Pursuit Guidance Strategy for an Unpowered Air-to-Ground Vehicle in Descending PhaseRelay cooperative tracking control of networked nonlinear multi-agent systems with communication delays: A data-driven methodNeurocomputing, Vol. 363Optimal Design of Distributed Adaptive Guidance Laws for Simultaneous AttackCooperative Strategies with Boundary Conditions for Optimal Aircraft Simultaneous Attack What's Popular Volume 41, Number 8August 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAir NavigationAircraft Operations and TechnologyAircraftsControl TheoryGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsOptimal Control TheoryUnmanned Aerial Vehicle KeywordsUnmanned Aerial VehicleOptimal ControlGuidance LawsRadar DetectionControl AlgorithmHeading AngleNewton's MethodNumerical SimulationRoboticsAcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 11332001 and 61773024, Innovation Research Project Fund 17-163-11-ZT-003-018-01, and the Joint Fund of the Ministry of Education of China 6141A020223.PDF Received26 November 2017Accepted11 March 2018Published online4 June 2018

Active Defense Guidance Law Via Cooperative Identification and Estimation

Hybrid Cooperative Guidance Law for Active Aircraft Defense Against a Guided Missile

Coverage-Based Cooperative Guidance Strategy by Controlling Flight Path Angle

Maneuver Control Strategies to Maximize Prediction Errors in Ballistic Middle Phase

Model Predictive Guidance for Active Aircraft Protection from a Homing Missile

Two-Stage Cooperative Guidance Strategy with Impact-Angle and Field-of-View Constraints

Three-Dimensional Cooperative Homing Guidance Law with Field-of-View Constraint

Adaptive Dynamic Surface Guidance Law with Input Saturation Constraint and Autopilot Dynamics

A New Continuous Adaptive Finite Time Guidance Law Against Highly Maneuvering Targets

Near-Optimal Midcourse Guidance for Velocity Maximization with Constrained Arrival Angle

Analytical Near-Optimal Distributed Consensus for Cooperative Salvo Guidance

Guidance and Ignition Control of Lateral-Jet-Controlled Interceptor Missiles

Cooperative Guidance Law with Maneuverability Awareness: A Decentralized Solution

An Improved Terminal Guidance Algorithm Based on Differential Game Theory

Closed-Loop Optimization Of Guidance Gain For Constrained Impact

Sliding-Mode Guidance for Simultaneous Control of Impact Time and Angle

Adaptive Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Cooperative Guidance Law in Active Defense Scenario

Impact Time and Angle Control Optimal Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint

Three-body Cooperative Active Defense Guidance Law with Overload Constraints: A Small Speed Ratio Perspective

Optimal Strategies for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in a Pursuit/Evasion Differential Game

Cooperative Estimation and Guidance Strategy Using Bearings-Only Measurements