Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteNonsingular Sliding-Mode Control for Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time GuidanceXiaotian Chen and Jinzhi WangXiaotian ChenState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author and Jinzhi WangState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Professor, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering; (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Jan 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003146SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law for Anti-Ship Missiles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2006, pp. 260–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.863655 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance with Generalized Proportional Navigation Based on Nonlinear Formulation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2016, pp. 1887–1892. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001681 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Homing Guidance Law for Cooperative Attack of Multiple Missiles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2010, pp. 275–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40136 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Kim T.-H., Lee C.-H., Jeon I.-S. and Tahk M.-J., “Augmented Polynomial Guidance with Impact Time and Angle Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2013, pp. 2806–2817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.6621856 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Kim M., Jung B., Han B., Lee S. and Kim Y., “Lyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Laws Against Stationary Targets,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1111–1122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2014.130717 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Kumar S. R. and Ghose D., “Sliding Mode Control Based Guidance Law with Impact Time Constraints,” American Control Conference (ACC), 2013, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2013, pp. 5760–5765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6580740 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Kumar S. R. and Ghose D., “Impact Time Guidance for Large Heading Errors Using Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2015, pp. 3123–3138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2015.140137 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Cho D., Kim H. J. and Tahk M.-J., “Nonsingular Sliding Mode Guidance for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2015, pp. 61–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001167 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Cho N. and Kim Y., “Modified Pure Proportional Navigation Guidance Law for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016, pp. 852–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001618 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Saleem A. and Ratnoo A., “Lyapunov-Based Guidance Law for Impact Time Control and Simultaneous Arrival,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2015, pp. 164–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001349 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Harl N. and Balakrishnan S., “Impact Time and Angle Guidance with Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1436–1449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2169795 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Erer K. S. and Tekin R., “Impact Time and Angle Control Based on Constrained Optimal Solutions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2448–2454. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000414 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Control of Impact Time with Increased Robustness via Feedback Linearization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2016, pp. 1682–1689. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001719 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Polynomial Shaping of the Look Angle for Impact-Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2017, pp. 2668–2673. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002751 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Zhang Y., Wang X. and Wu H., “Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Field of View Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Dec. 2014, pp. 361–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.10.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Kim H.-G. and Kim H. J., “Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Seeker’s Field-of-View Limits,” 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2016, pp. 4160–4165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2016.7798900 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Zhang Y., Wang X. and Wu H., “Impact Time Control Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint Accounting for Uncertain System Lag,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 230, No. 3, 2016, pp. 515–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015594401 Google Scholar[18] Jeon I. S. and Lee J. I., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law with Constraints on Seeker Look Angle,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 5, Oct 2017, pp. 2621–2627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2698837 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Feng Y., Yu X. and Han F., “On Nonsingular Terminal Sliding-Mode Control of Nonlinear Systems,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2013, pp. 1715–1722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.051 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byVarying-Gain Proportional Navigation Guidance for Precise Impact Time ControlWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 13 November 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 46, No. 3Impact time control guidance against maneuvering targets based on a nonlinear virtual relative modelChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 14Lyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Performance Prediction20 March 2023 | Aerospace, Vol. 10, No. 3Consensus-Based Finite-Time Cooperative Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint22 June 2022 | International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 5Nonlinear Optimal Guidance for Intercepting Stationary Targets with Impact-Time ConstraintsKun Wang , Zheng Chen , Han Wang, Jun Li and Xueming Shao30 May 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 9Deep reinforcement learning-based impact time control guidance law with constraints on the field-of-viewAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 128Terminal sliding mode guidance design under impact angle and time constraints in three-dimensional spaceCooperative Circular Guidance with Nonuniform Field-of-View ConstraintsYadong Chen, Daqing Guo, Jianan Wang , Jiayuan Shan and Ming Xin 31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Unified Method for Field-of-View-Limited Homing GuidanceWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang , Hungsun Son and Ming Xin 17 April 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Three-dimensional field of view and impact angle constrained guidance with terminal speed maximizationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Three-Dimensional Nonsingular Impact Time Guidance With Limited Field-of-ViewIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 30, No. 4Fixed-Time Circular Impact-Time Guidance with Look Angle Constraint5 July 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 7Sliding mode–based simultaneous control of impact angle and impact time5 July 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 7Fixed-Time Terminal Angle-Constrained Cooperative Guidance Law Against Maneuvering TargetIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Composite Guidance for Impact Time Control Under Physical ConstraintsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Cooperative guidance laws against highly maneuvering target with impact time and angle15 June 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 5A hybrid proportional navigation based two-stage impact time control guidance lawJournal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 33, No. 2Three-Dimensional Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Field-of-View Constraint and Velocity Variation9 April 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 4Adjustable impact-time-control guidance law against non-maneuvering target under limited field of view17 May 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 2Distributed Cooperative Guidance of Multi-missile with Unreliable Communications18 March 2022Three Dimensional Nonlinear Guidance Law for Exact Impact Time ControlIEEE Access, Vol. 10Three-Dimensional Prescribed-Time Pinning Group Cooperative Guidance LawInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2021Time-Constrained Individual Homing Guidance against Stationary TargetsThree-Dimensional Nonsingular Cooperative Guidance Law with Different Field-of-View ConstraintsWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Studies on Multi-Constraints Cooperative Guidance Method Based on Distributed MPC for Multi-Missiles17 November 2021 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 22Look-Angle-Constrained Control of Arrival Time with Exact Knowledge of Time-to-GoNamhoon Cho and Seokwon Lee 26 May 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Guidance Against Stationary TargetsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 57, No. 5Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Control Guidance via Time-Varying Sliding Mode Control6 September 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 9Optimal three-dimensional impact time guidance with seeker’s field-of-view constraintChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 34, No. 2Terminal Time-Constrained Nonlinear Interception Strategies Against Maneuvering TargetsShashi Ranjan Kumar and Dwaipayan Mukherjee2 September 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 1Two-phase guidance law for impact time control under physical constraintsChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 33, No. 11Consensus Based Cooperative Guidance with a LeaderImpact-Time-Control Guidance Strategy with a Composite Structure Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View ConstraintSeokwon Lee, Namhoon Cho and Youdan Kim27 April 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 8Deviated Pursuit based Cooperative Simultaneous Interception against Moving TargetsFinite-Time Impact Time Guidance using Deviated Pursuit against Maneuvering TargetsNonlinear Impact Time Guidance with Constrained Field-of-ViewA Guidance Strategy for Strapdown Seeker considering Minimum Field-of-View Angle ConstraintInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2020Optimal Error Dynamics in Missile Guidance14 May 2020Nonsingular PNG-Based Impact Time Control Guidance with Lower Dependence on Time-to-Go EstimateInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2019Deviated Pursuit Based Interception at A Priori Fixed TimeShashi Ranjan Kumar and Dwaipayan Mukherjee21 April 2019 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 9Circular Impact-Time GuidanceRonny Tsalik and Tal Shima29 May 2019 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 8Fixed Final Time Field of View and Impact Angle Constrained GuidanceAnalytical Impact Time Guidance Law with Reduced Filed-of-View LimitImpact Time Control Guidance with Finite-Time Convergence Based on Pure Proportional NavigationCapturability of Guidance Laws for Interception of Nonmaneuvering Target with Field-of-View LimitSeokwon Lee, Sungjun Ann, Namhoon Cho and Youdan Kim20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 4Three-Dimensional Optimal Impact Time Guidance for Antiship MissilesShaoming He and Defu Lin26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 4Impact Time Control Guidance Law for Guided Projectile Considering Time-Varying VelocitySliding-Mode Impact Time Guidance Law Design for Various Target MotionsQinglei Hu, Tuo Han and Ming Xin17 July 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 1Adaptive Polynomial Guidance With Impact Angle Constraint Under Varying VelocityIEEE Access, Vol. 7 What's Popular Volume 41, Number 5May 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAvionicsControl TheoryFeedback ControlGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsMilitary ScienceMilitary TechnologyMissile Guidance and ControlMissile Remote Control GuidanceMissile Systems, Dynamics and TechnologyNavigational GuidanceOptimal Control TheoryWeapon Systems KeywordsTerminal Sliding ModeControl GuidanceAutopilotUnmanned Aerial VehicleFlight Path AngleAngle of AttackProportional NavigationClose In Weapon SystemsFeedback LinearizationNumerical AlgorithmsAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under grants 61473003 and 61633001.PDF Received28 June 2017Accepted4 December 2017Published online2 January 2018

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteOptimal Strategies for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in a Pursuit/Evasion Differential GameXiaoqian Wei and Jianying YangXiaoqian WeiPeking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China and Jianying YangPeking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaPublished Online:4 Jun 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003480SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Sprinkle J., Eklund J. M., Kim H. J. and Sastry S., “Encoding Aerial Pursuit/Evasion Games with Fixed Wing Aircraft into a Nonlinear Model Predictive Tracking Controller,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 3, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2004, pp. 2609–2614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2004.1428851 Google Scholar[2] Scott W. and Leonard N. E., “Pursuit, Herding and Evasion: A Three-Agent Model of Caribou Predation,” American Control Conference, IEEE Publ., Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 2978–2983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6580287 Google Scholar[3] Earl M. G. and D'Andrea R., “A Decomposition Approach to Multi-Vehicle Cooperative Control,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2005, pp. 276–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2006.11.002 RASOEJ 0921-8890 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Shaferman V. and Shima T., “Cooperative Multiple-Model Adaptive Guidance for an Aircraft Defending Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1801–1813. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.49515 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Garcia E., Casbeer D. W. and Pachter M., “Active Target Defense Using First Order Missile Models,” Automatica, Vol. 78, April 2017, pp. 139–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.12.032 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Gutman S., Goldan O. and Rubinsky S., “Guaranteed Miss Distance in Guidance Systems with Bounded Controls and Bounded Noise,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2012, pp. 816–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55723 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Boyell R. L., “Defending a Moving Target Against Missile or Torpedo Attack,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-12, No. 4, 1976, pp. 522–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1976.308338 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Rubinsky S. and Gutman S., “Three-Player Pursuit and Evasion Conflict,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2014, pp. 98–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.61832 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Shima T., “Optimal Cooperative Pursuit and Evasion Strategies Against a Homing Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2012, pp. 414–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51765 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Prokopov O. and Shima T., “Linear Quadratic Optimal Cooperative Strategies for Active Aircraft Protection,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2013, pp. 753–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.58531 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Li D. and Cruz J. B., “Defending an Asset: A Linear Quadratic Game Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2011, pp. 1026–1044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2011.5751240 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Ratnoo A. and Shima T., “Line-of-Sight Interceptor Guidance for Defending an Aircraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2012, pp. 522–532. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50572 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Garcia E., Casbeer D. W. and Pachter M., “Escape Regions of the Active Target Defense Differential Game,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, ASME Paper DSCC2015-9628, Columbus, OH, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2015-9628 Google Scholar[14] Casbeer D. W., Garcia E. and Pachter M., “The Target Differential Game with Two Defenders,” International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2016, pp. 202–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2016.7502560 Google Scholar[15] Oyler D. W., Kabamba P. T. and Girard A. R., “Pursuit—Evasion Games in the Presence of Obstacles,” Automatica, Vol. 65, March 2016, pp. 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.11.018 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Perelman A., Shima T. and Rusnak I., “Cooperative Differential Games Strategies for Active Aircraft Protection from a Homing Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2011, pp. 761–773. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51611 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Ratnoo A. and Shima T., “Guidance Strategies Against Defended Aerial Targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1059–1068. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56924 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Yamasaki T., Balakrishnan S. N. and Takano H., “Modified Command to Line-of-Sight Intercept Guidance for Aircraft Defense,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2013, pp. 898–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.58566 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Garcia E., Casbeer D. W. and Pachter M., “Cooperative Strategies for Optimal Aircraft Defense from an Attacking Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1510–1520. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001083 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] Li D., Cruz J. B., Chen G. and Kwan C., “A Hierarchical Approach to Multi-Player Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 18, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2005, pp. 5674–5679. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2005.1583067 Google Scholar[21] Wei M., Chen G., Cruz J. B., Haynes L., Pham K. and Blasch E., “Multi-Pursuer Multi-Evader Pursuit-Evasion Games with Jamming Confrontation,” Journal of Aerospace Computing Information and Communication, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2009, pp. 693–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25329 LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Lin W., Qu Z. and Simaan M. A., “Nash Strategies for Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games Involving Limited Observations,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1347–1356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2014.130569 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Ibragimov G. I. and Salimi M., “Pursuit-Evasion Differential Game with Many Inertial Players,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2009, 2009, Article 653723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/653723 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[24] Salimi M., “A Research Contribution on an Evasion Problem,” SeMA Journal, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2018, pp. 139–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-017-0122-4 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Sun S., Zhang Q., Loxton R. and Li B., “Numerical Solution of a Pursuit-Evasion Differential Game Involving Two Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbit,” Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2015, pp. 1127–1147. doi:https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo CrossrefGoogle Scholar[26] Li D., Cruz J. B. and Schumacher C. J., “Stochastic Multi-Player Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2008, pp. 218–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1239 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[27] Raboin E., Kuter U. and Nau D., “Generating Strategies for Multi-Agent Pursuit-Evasion Games in Partially Observable Euclidean Space,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 3, Richland, SC, 2012, pp. 1201–1202. Google Scholar[28] Isaacs R., “Games of Pursuit,” Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA, 1951. Google Scholar[29] Isaacs R., Differential Games. A Mathematical Theory with Application to Warfare and Pursuit, Control and Optimization, 1st ed., Wiley, New York, 1965, Chap. 3. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byJustification of the geometric solution of a target defense game with faster defenders and a convex target area using the HJI equationAutomatica, Vol. 149Intelligent Game Strategies in Target-Missile-Defender Engagement Using Curriculum-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning31 January 2023 | Aerospace, Vol. 10, No. 2Optimal-Damage-Effectiveness Cooperative-Control Strategy for the Pursuit–Evasion Problem with Multiple Guided Missiles30 November 2022 | Sensors, Vol. 22, No. 23Cooperative strategy for pursuit-evasion problem with collision avoidanceOcean Engineering, Vol. 266Cooperative guidance laws for interception of active maneuvering target under information symmetric and asymmetric conditions11 November 2022 | International Journal of Control, Vol. 84Deployment Optimization of Defense Stations in an Attack-Defense Aerial War Game25 October 2022 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 21Quick identification of guidance law for an incoming missile using multiple-model mechanismChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 9Multi-missile interception for multi-targets: Dynamic situation assessment, target allocation and cooperative interception in groupsJournal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 359, No. 12Cooperative Hunting Strategy with a Superior Evader Based on Differential GameComplexity, Vol. 2022Self-Organizing Cooperative Pursuit Strategy for Multi-USV with Dynamic Obstacle Ships20 April 2022 | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 5Optimal deployment of swarm positions in cooperative interception of multiple UAV swarmsDigital Communications and Networks, Vol. 72On the Strategies of Defending a Target against Multiple IntrudersHan Fu and Hugh H. Liu4 January 2021Distributed cooperative encirclement hunting guidance for multiple flight vehicles systemAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 95An Integral Evasion and Pursuit Guidance Strategy for an Unpowered Air-to-Ground Vehicle in Descending PhaseRelay cooperative tracking control of networked nonlinear multi-agent systems with communication delays: A data-driven methodNeurocomputing, Vol. 363Optimal Design of Distributed Adaptive Guidance Laws for Simultaneous AttackCooperative Strategies with Boundary Conditions for Optimal Aircraft Simultaneous Attack What's Popular Volume 41, Number 8August 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAir NavigationAircraft Operations and TechnologyAircraftsControl TheoryGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsOptimal Control TheoryUnmanned Aerial Vehicle KeywordsUnmanned Aerial VehicleOptimal ControlGuidance LawsRadar DetectionControl AlgorithmHeading AngleNewton's MethodNumerical SimulationRoboticsAcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 11332001 and 61773024, Innovation Research Project Fund 17-163-11-ZT-003-018-01, and the Joint Fund of the Ministry of Education of China 6141A020223.PDF Received26 November 2017Accepted11 March 2018Published online4 June 2018

Hybrid Cooperative Guidance Law for Active Aircraft Defense Against a Guided Missile

Active Defense Guidance Law Via Cooperative Identification and Estimation

Coverage-Based Cooperative Guidance Strategy by Controlling Flight Path Angle

Two-Stage Cooperative Guidance Strategy with Impact-Angle and Field-of-View Constraints

Model Predictive Guidance for Active Aircraft Protection from a Homing Missile

Sliding-Mode Guidance for Simultaneous Control of Impact Time and Angle

Adaptive Dynamic Surface Guidance Law with Input Saturation Constraint and Autopilot Dynamics

Impact Time and Angle Control Optimal Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint

Cooperative Guidance Law with Maneuverability Awareness: A Decentralized Solution

Nonsingular Sliding-Mode Control for Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Guidance

Smooth Sliding Mode Control for Missile Interception with Finite-Time Convergence

Cooperative Polynomial Guidance Law with Collision Avoidance and Flight Path Angle Coordination

Cooperative Smooth Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Guidance with Tracking Differentiator for Active Aircraft Defense

Multi-agent cooperative multi-model adaptive guidance law

Cooperative Robust Line-of-Sight Guidance Law for Aerial Target Defense

Adaptive Sliding-Mode Guidance of A Homing Missile

Optimal Cooperative Guidance with Guaranteed Miss Distance in Three-Body Engagement

Optimal Launch Time Selection in Target-Missile-Defender Scenario

Optimal Strategies for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in a Pursuit/Evasion Differential Game

Adaptive Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Cooperative Guidance Law in Active Defense Scenario

Cooperative Strategy for Aircraft Defense Line-of-Sight Guidance in Three-Dimensional Space